Home Renal & Nephrology Peritoneal Dialysis

Peritoneal Dialysis

πŸ“‹ Key Information Summary

πŸ“‹
  • Peritoneal dialysis (PD) uses the peritoneal membrane as a semipermeable dialyser, enabling home-based renal replacement therapy that preserves residual renal function more effectively than facility haemodialysis.
  • Two main modalities exist: continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) β€” 4–5 manual exchanges daily, and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) β€” overnight cycling with a cycler machine.
  • Australia has ~1,900 prevalent PD patients (ANZDATA 2023); PD accounts for ~12% of all dialysis, with higher uptake in rural and remote settings due to home-based delivery.
  • Peritonitis remains the leading complication β€” incidence ~0.22 episodes per patient-year in Australia β€” and the primary reason for technique failure.
  • Coagulase-negative staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus cause ~60% of peritonitis episodes; Gram-negative and polymicrobial peritonitis are increasing in frequency.
  • Peritonitis empiric therapy: intraperitoneal vancomycin (loading dose 30 mg/kg, max 2 g in 1 L bag) PLUS intraperitoneal gentamicin or ceftazidime, adjusted for local antibiogram.
  • Dialysis adequacy targets Kt/V β‰₯ 1.7 weekly for both CAPD and APD; total (residual + PD) Kt/V β‰₯ 2.0 per week preferred.
  • Peritoneal access via Tenckhoff catheter insertion β€” surgical open technique or laparoscopic placement β€” with a break-in period of β‰₯2 weeks before use.
  • Exit-site care with daily topical mupirocin (or gentamicin) cream reduces catheter-related infection by up to 50%.
  • Cardinal PD complications include peritonitis, exit-site/tunnel infection, hernias, encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS), and membrane failure.
  • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have higher rates of ESKD and PD-related peritonitis; culturally safe training, remote support, and community nursing improve outcomes.
  • Pregnancy is feasible on PD with close multidisciplinary monitoring; dialysis prescriptions require frequent modification, and APD may be preferred in later trimesters.

Introduction & Australian Epidemiology

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a home-based renal replacement therapy that harnesses the peritoneal membrane β€” a large (1.7–2.0 mΒ²) serosal surface lining the abdominal cavity β€” as a biological dialyser. A sterile dialysate is instilled into the peritoneal cavity via a surgically implanted Tenckhoff catheter, and solute clearance occurs via diffusion and convection, while water removal (ultrafiltration) is driven by osmotic gradients created by dextrose or icodextrin.

PD is a well-established modality in Australia and New Zealand. According to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA 2023), approximately 1,900 patients are on prevalent PD in Australia, representing roughly 12% of the total dialysis population. PD utilisation is disproportionately higher in regional and remote communities where facility haemodialysis access is limited.

Key advantages of PD over facility haemodialysis include: preservation of residual renal function, dietary and fluid flexibility, reduced need for vascular access, greater patient autonomy, and comparable survival outcomes in the first 2–4 years (particularly in non-diabetic patients). The two principal modalities β€” continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) β€” offer flexibility to suit lifestyle, transport, and clinical requirements.

πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί
Australian context: The Australian Kidney Framework (National Chronic Kidney Disease Strategy 2020) and Kidney Health Australia advocate for increased PD uptake as a first-line home therapy to reduce wait-list pressure and improve patient-centred care.
Peritoneal Dialysis clinical infographic β€” pathophysiology, clinical clues, diagnosis, imaging, and management
Tap or click image to enlarge β€” Peritoneal Dialysis: pathophysiology, clinical clues, diagnosis, imaging, and management.
Peritoneal Dialysis infographic, full size

Principles: CAPD vs APD

Mechanisms of Solute and Water Transport

PD relies on two fundamental transport processes:

  • Diffusion: Solutes move down concentration gradients across the peritoneal membrane. Small molecules (urea, potassium, creatinine) equilibrate quickly; larger molecules (Ξ²β‚‚-microglobulin) clear more slowly.
  • Ultrafiltration (UF): Osmotic agents in dialysate β€” dextrose (1.36%, 2.27%, 3.86%) or icodextrin 7.5% β€” draw water into the peritoneal cavity. Net UF depends on dwell time, membrane transport status (PET category), and lymphatic absorption.

Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD)

CAPD involves 4–5 manual exchanges per day with dwell times of 4–6 hours during the day and a single overnight dwell of 8–10 hours. Each exchange uses 1.5–3 L of dialysate.

πŸ”„
CAPD β€” Standard Regimen
Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
Exchanges 4–5 per day (e.g. 0700, 1200, 1700, 2200 Β± midday)
Volume 2.0–2.5 L per exchange
Dwell 4–6 h day / 8–10 h overnight
Dextrose strengths 1.36% (G1.5), 2.27% (G2.5), 3.86% (G4.25)
Icodextrin 7.5% β€” once daily (overnight or long-day dwell) for sustained UF

Automated Peritoneal Dialysis (APD)

APD uses a cycler machine to deliver multiple short exchanges overnight (6–10 h). During the day, the patient may remain "dry" (tidal mode) or carry a day dwell (continuous cycling PD / CCPD). APD is the most common PD modality in Australia (~65% of PD patients).

πŸ–₯️
APD β€” Standard Regimen
Automated peritoneal dialysis (cycler-based)
Night exchanges 5–9 cycles overnight (6–10 h)
Fill volume 1.5–3.0 L per cycle
Tidal mode Partial drain (50–80%) between cycles; residual kept in situ
Day dwell Optional 1.5–2 L day exchange or icodextrin dwell
Ultrafiltration Higher UF with icodextrin day dwell in "wet" CCPD mode

CAPD vs APD β€” Comparative Overview

Feature CAPD APD
Exchanges4–5 manual5–9 overnight (cycler)
Day freedom4 h dwell in situDry or single day dwell
EquipmentMinimal (bags, stand)Cycler, power supply, storage
Cost (PBS)Lower consumable costHigher consumable + cycler hire
Solute clearanceAdequate for mostSuperior small-molecule clearance
Peritoneal membraneHigh transporters less suitedBetter for high transporters
LifestyleFlexible daytimeFree days; tied to cycler nights
Peritonitis riskSimilar (exposure to open exchanges)Similar (closed system, fewer connections)

Peritoneal Equilibration Test (PET)

The PET stratifies patients by membrane transport characteristics using a 2.27% dextrose exchange with 4-hour dwell. Dialysate-to-plasma creatinine ratio (D/P Cr) at 4 hours classifies transporters:

  • High: D/P Cr β‰₯ 0.81 β€” rapid solute equilibration; benefits from short dwell APD
  • High-average: D/P Cr 0.65–0.80
  • Low-average: D/P Cr 0.50–0.64
  • Low: D/P Cr < 0.50 β€” slow equilibration; suits CAPD with long dwells

A standard PET should be performed at 4–6 weeks post-initiation and repeated annually or when adequacy declines.

⚠️
Modality selection: APD is preferred for high/high-average transporters, patients needing daytime freedom, large body habitus requiring enhanced clearance, or anuric patients. CAPD suits low/low-average transporters and patients without reliable power or cycler access.

Peritoneal Access & Catheter Placement

Tenckhoff Catheter

The straight or coiled double-cuff Tenckhoff catheter is the standard PD access device in Australia. Cuffs (Dacron felt) promote tissue ingrowth and anchor the catheter subcutaneously, providing a bacterial barrier.

Insertion Techniques

Technique Details Advantages
Surgical (open)Mini-laparotomy, direct vision placementMost common in Australia; precise positioning
LaparoscopicUnder direct camera vision Β± omentopexyHernia repair concurrent; reduced catheter migration
PeritoneoscopicNeedle-guided trocar insertionMinimally invasive; local anaesthesia
Image-guidedFluoroscopic-assisted placementRescue for malpositioned catheters

Pre-Operative Preparation

  • Nasal Staphylococcus aureus decolonisation: mupirocin nasal ointment 2% BID for 5 days pre-procedure (reduces S. aureus exit-site infection by 60–80%)
  • Peri-operative antibiotics: single-dose IV first-generation cephalosporin (cefazolin 2 g IV) or vancomycin 1 g IV if MRSA colonised
  • Bowel preparation: routine use is centre-dependent; some recommend low-residue diet + stool softeners
  • Bladder decompression: ensure patient voids or insert catheter pre-operatively to reduce bowel/bladder injury risk
  • Pre-operative PET not required β€” perform after break-in

Break-In Period & Initial Exchanges

  • Minimum 2-week healing period before routine PD use (reduce pericatheter leak)
  • Day 0–14: flush-and-fill with 500–1,000 mL heparinised saline (500 U/L) 2–3 times per week (or daily), draining immediately β€” this trains the patient while avoiding intraperitoneal pressure
  • If urgent dialysis needed before break-in completes, low-volume APD (1–1.5 L) may be attempted with caution
  • Avoid constipation (stool softeners, macrogol) β€” straining increases hernia and catheter migration risk

Exit-Site Care

Daily exit-site care with topical antibiotic cream is a standard of care in Australia:

  • First-line: Mupirocin 2% cream applied to exit site daily (reduces exit-site infection by ~50%)
  • Alternative: Gentamicin 0.1% cream if mupirocin resistance suspected
  • Keep exit site dry; cover with sterile dressing post-shower until healed
  • Secure catheter to avoid traction; use a catheter belt
βœ…
PBS item: Mupirocin nasal ointment 2% (PBS Authority β€” restricted benefit) and topical mupirocin cream are PBS-listed for S. aureus decolonisation and exit-site care.

Peritonitis: Diagnosis & Management

Peritonitis is the most common serious complication of PD and the leading cause of catheter loss and transfer to haemodialysis. The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) 2022 guidelines and Australian PD unit protocols form the basis of management.

Diagnostic Criteria

Peritonitis is diagnosed when at least two of the following are present:

  • Clinical features: abdominal pain, cloudy effluent, fever, nausea/vomiting
  • Peritoneal effluent WBC > 100/ΞΌL (or > 0.1 Γ— 10⁹/L) with β‰₯ 50% polymorphonuclear cells
  • Positive effluent culture (may be negative in 15–20% of cases)

Specimen Collection

  • Obtain effluent sample before administering antibiotics
  • Send for cell count (WBC, differential), Gram stain, culture (aerobic + anaerobic), and sensitivity
  • Use blood culture bottles: inoculate 10 mL effluent into each of aerobic and anaerobic bottles at bedside (increases culture yield by ~20%)
  • If cloudy effluent with negative culture, consider fungal culture, TB culture, unusual organisms, or chemical peritonitis

Causative Organisms β€” Australian Patterns

Organism Category Common Organisms Approximate %
Gram-positive cocciCoagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), S. aureus, Streptococcus spp.45–55%
Gram-negative bacilliE. coli, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, Proteus20–30%
PolymicrobialMixed flora (consider bowel perforation)10–15%
FungalCandida spp., Aspergillus3–5%
Culture-negativeβ€”15–20%

Empiric Antibiotic Therapy

Commence empiric antibiotics immediately after effluent collection. In Australia, ISPD 2022–compliant regimens use intraperitoneal (IP) delivery as standard:

πŸ’‰
Vancomycin (IP)
Glycopeptide β€” covers Gram-positive (including MRSA)
Loading dose 30 mg/kg IP in 1 L bag (max 3 g), dwell β‰₯ 6 h
Maintenance 15 mg/kg IP every 3–5 days guided by trough levels (target 15–20 ΞΌg/mL)
Route Intraperitoneal (continuous or intermittent)
Renal adj. Not required (dose per weight); monitor levels
PBS status βœ” PBS General Benefit
πŸ’‰
Gentamicin (IP)
Aminoglycoside β€” covers Gram-negative
Dose 0.6 mg/kg IP once daily in 1 L dwell
Max duration Limit to ≀ 3 weeks if possible (ototoxicity risk)
Alternative Ceftazidime 1 g IP if gentamicin contraindicated
PBS status βœ” PBS General Benefit
πŸ’‰
Ceftazidime (IP)
Third-generation cephalosporin β€” Pseudomonas cover
Dose 1 g IP once daily (continuous or intermittent)
Use Preferred when Pseudomonas suspected or gentamicin contraindicated
PBS status βœ” PBS General Benefit
⚠️
Standard empiric regimen: Vancomycin IP (30 mg/kg, max 3 g) + Gentamicin IP (0.6 mg/kg daily) OR Ceftazidime IP (1 g daily). Adjust based on culture and sensitivity at 48–72 h. For patients with anaphylaxis to Ξ²-lactams, consider aztreonam IP as Gram-negative cover.

Directed Therapy (Post-Culture)

Organism Directed Treatment Duration
CNS (methicillin-sensitive)Cephazolin 1 g IP daily (or oral cephalexin if mild)14 days total
CNS (methicillin-resistant)Vancomycin IP (continue current regimen)14 days total
S. aureus (MSSA)Flucloxacillin 2 g IV TDS or cephazolin 1 g IP daily21 days (check for tunnel infection)
S. aureus (MRSA)Vancomycin IP21 days
Pseudomonas aeruginosaCeftazidime 1 g IP daily + oral ciprofloxacin 500 mg BD21 days (dual therapy)
Enterococcus spp.Ampicillin 125 mg/L IP (or IV 1 g TDS) Β± gentamicin14 days
PolymicrobialBroaden per sensitivities; CT abdomen if bowel perforation suspected14–21 days
Fungal (Candida spp.)Catheter removal + fluconazole 200 mg PO daily or amphotericin B IPCatheter removal is essential

Catheter Removal Indications

  • Refractory peritonitis: no clinical improvement after 5 days of appropriate antibiotics
  • Relapsing peritonitis (same organism within 4 weeks of completing therapy)
  • Fungal peritonitis β€” remove catheter immediately
  • Concurrent exit-site/tunnel infection (refractory or S. aureus)
  • Bowel perforation with peritonitis
  • Recurrent peritonitis (>3 episodes)

Exit-Site & Tunnel Infection

Defined by purulent or serous discharge Β± erythema at the catheter exit site; tunnel infection involves tenderness/erythema along the subcutaneous tunnel.

  • Swab discharge for culture before starting treatment
  • Empiric: oral cephalexin 500 mg QID or flucloxacillin 500 mg QID (MSSA); add oral rifampicin 300 mg BD if MRSA suspected
  • Pseudomonas: oral ciprofloxacin 500 mg BD Β± IP ceftazidime
  • Consider catheter removal if no response at 2–3 weeks or concurrent peritonitis

Adequacy & Complications

Dialysis Adequacy Assessment

PD adequacy is measured by urea clearance (Kt/V) and creatinine clearance (CrCl), normalised to body water and body surface area respectively. Targets are set by ISPD and adapted in Australian PD units:

Parameter CAPD Target APD Target
Weekly Kt/V (PD alone)β‰₯ 1.7β‰₯ 1.7
Weekly Kt/V (total: PD + residual)β‰₯ 2.0 (preferred)β‰₯ 2.0 (preferred)
Weekly CrCl (L/1.73 mΒ²)β‰₯ 50 Lβ‰₯ 60 L (if residual function present)
Ultrafiltrationβ‰₯ 750 mL/day (clinically)β‰₯ 750 mL/day
Anuria thresholdUUV < 200 mL/dayUUV < 200 mL/day

Prescription Modification for Inadequate Clearance

  • Increase fill volume (e.g. 2.0 β†’ 2.5 L per exchange)
  • Add an extra exchange (CAPD: 4 β†’ 5 exchanges)
  • For APD: increase cycle number, use tidal mode, add a daytime exchange
  • Use icodextrin for long dwells to improve UF without dextrose load
  • Preserve residual renal function: avoid nephrotoxins (NSAIDs, aminoglycosides systemically), avoid hypotension
  • If anuric and Kt/V remains below target despite maximising prescription, consider transfer to haemodialysis

Complications of PD

Common
Mechanical Complications
Catheter migration, leakage (pericatheter or inguinal hernia), hernias (umbilical, inguinal β€” ~15% lifetime risk), haemorrhagic effluent
Management: Surgical review; reduce fill volume; hernia repair
Moderate
Metabolic Complications
Hyperglycaemia (dextrose absorption 100–300 g/day), hyperinsulinaemia, dyslipidaemia, weight gain, protein-energy wasting, hypokalaemia
Management: Dietary counselling; icodextrin to reduce glucose load; potassium supplementation
Serious
Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis (EPS)
Rare but potentially fatal (~0.5–3% after >5 years PD). Thickened peritoneal membrane encasing bowel β†’ obstruction, malnutrition. Risk factors: long PD duration (>5 years), recurrent peritonitis, chlorhexidine use
Management: Transfer to haemodialysis; nutritional support; surgical enterolysis (debated); tamoxifen; corticosteroids
🚨
EPS β€” Red flags: Unexplained bowel obstruction, ascites, bloody effluent, weight loss in long-term PD patients. CT abdomen with contrast: thickened peritoneum, calcification, loculated fluid, bowel tethering. Early referral to EPS-experienced centre.

Membrane Failure

Peritoneal membrane failure may manifest as:

  • Loss of ultrafiltration (< 400 mL/4h with 3.86% dextrose)
  • High transporter status on repeat PET (D/P Cr > 0.81) β€” suggests membrane damage
  • Inadequate solute clearance despite maximal prescription

Options: modify prescription (shorter dwells, icodextrin), add APD, or consider conversion to haemodialysis or renal transplantation.

Nutritional Considerations

  • Protein intake: 1.0–1.2 g/kg/day (higher than HD due to peritoneal losses of 5–15 g/day protein + amino acids)
  • Energy intake: 25–35 kcal/kg/day (including dextrose absorbed from dialysate)
  • Potassium: generally liberal unless hyperkalaemic (PD removes potassium)
  • Sodium restriction: 80–100 mmol/day for volume management
  • Phosphate: dietary restriction + phosphate binders (sevelamer, lanthanum, calcium carbonate β€” PBS-listed)
  • Regular dietitian review (minimum 6-monthly)

Special Populations

🀰 Pregnancy
Feasibility
PD can be continued in pregnancy; many successful pregnancies reported. Requires close nephrology, obstetric, and dietitian collaboration.
Prescription changes
Increase exchange frequency (CAPD β†’ APD preferred); reduce fill volume as uterus enlarges; monitor adequacy weekly in 3rd trimester.
Medications
Avoid erythropoietin-stimulating agents at high doses; use iron infusion cautiously. Many PD-related antibiotics are safe (cephazolin, amoxicillin); avoid aminoglycosides if possible (ototoxicity risk to fetus).
πŸ‘Ά Paediatrics
Indication
PD is the preferred dialysis modality in children < 5 years and in those awaiting transplantation. Preserves growth, allows home schooling.
Catheter
Paediatric Tenckhoff catheter; single cuff preferred in infants. Laparoscopic placement is standard at paediatric centres.
Dose
Target Kt/V β‰₯ 1.8/week; fill volume 800–1,200 mL/mΒ² body surface area. Peritonitis management mirrors adult protocols with weight-based dosing.
πŸ‘΄ Elderly
Considerations
Assisted PD programmes in Australia allow family or community nurses to perform exchanges. Co-morbidities (cognitive impairment, manual dexterity) may preclude self-care.
Outcomes
Comparable survival to HD in the elderly for the first 2–3 years; reduced hospital travel burden is a major advantage.
🩺 Residual Renal Function
Preservation
Residual function contributes significantly to total clearance. Avoid NSAIDs, aminoglycosides, radiocontrast. ACE inhibitors / ARBs may slow decline (evidence mixed in PD).
πŸ›‘οΈ Immunocompromised
Peritonitis risk
Higher peritonitis rates; lower threshold for empiric antibiotics. Consider fungal peritonitis prophylaxis (fluconazole) during antibiotic courses in high-risk patients.
Vaccination
Ensure pneumococcal, influenza, hepatitis B, and COVID-19 vaccination are up to date.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Considerations

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples experience end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) at rates approximately 7–10 times higher than non-Indigenous Australians (AIHW 2023). PD is an important modality in remote and very remote communities where facility haemodialysis is unavailable or requires relocation to urban centres, causing significant social and cultural disruption.

Key Considerations

Epidemiology
ATSI peoples account for ~20% of new ESKD registrations; higher PD utilisation in remote NT, WA, and QLD communities. Peritonitis rates are 2–3 times the national average in some remote areas.
Access barriers
Housing conditions (clean water supply, safe storage), limited refrigeration for dialysate, distance to PD units for supplies and training. Freight costs for dialysate delivery are a significant logistical and financial burden.
Training approach
Culturally safe, community-based training delivered by Aboriginal Health Workers (AHWs) and community nurses with interpreter support. Teach-back methods, visual aids, and family-centred training improve technique and adherence.
Infection prevention
Higher peritonitis rates driven by housing, water quality, and fly burden. RhDAustralia guidelines for remote PD care recommend community-based exit-site surveillance, insect screens, and mupirocin prophylaxis.
Workforce
Remote area nurses (RANs) and AHWs provide primary PD support. Telehealth nephrology outreach (e.g. NT Renal Services) enables specialist oversight without patient travel. Locate PD supply depots in community health centres.
Outcomes
With appropriate support, PD technique survival and patient survival are comparable to urban cohorts. Cultural safety, continuity of care, and keeping people on Country are central goals of the National Indigenous Kidney Transplantation Taskforce.
πŸ’š
RHDAustralia: The Remote Dialysis Handbook (RHDAustralia) provides detailed guidance on remote PD management, supply logistics, and peritonitis prevention strategies tailored to ATSI communities.

πŸ“š References

  1. 1. Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA). 46th Annual Report 2023. Adelaide: ANZDATA; 2023.
  2. 2. Li PKT, Chow KM, Cho Y, et al. ISPD peritonitis guideline recommendations: 2022 update on prevention and treatment. Peritoneal Dialysis International. 2022;42(2):110–153.
  3. 3. Li PKT, Chow KM, Van de Luijtgaarden MWM, et al. Changes in the worldwide epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis. Nature Reviews Nephrology. 2017;13(2):90–103.
  4. 4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Chronic kidney disease: Australian facts. Cat. no. PHE 229. Canberra: AIHW; 2023.
  5. 5. Kidney Health Australia. Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Management in Primary Care. 4th ed. Melbourne: Kidney Health Australia; 2020.
  6. 6. Remote Area Health Corps / RHDAustralia. Remote Dialysis Handbook: Peritoneal Dialysis. Darwin: RHDAustralia; 2022.
  7. 7. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. 2nd ed. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2021.
  8. 8. Boudville N, Kemp A, Clayton P, et al. Recent peritonitis associates with mortality among patients treated with peritoneal dialysis. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2012;23(8):1398–1405.
  9. 9. Cho Y, Boudville N, Palmer SC, et al. Practice of peritoneal dialysis catheter flushing in Australia and New Zealand: multi-centre cross-sectional survey. Nephrology. 2018;23(2):167–173.
  10. 10. Johnson DW, Brown FG, Clarke M, et al. Effects of biocompatible versus standard fluid on peritoneal dialysis outcomes. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2012;23(6):1097–1107.
  11. 11. Korte MR, Sampimon DE, Betjes MG, Krediet RT. Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: the state of affairs. Nature Reviews Nephrology. 2011;7(9):528–538.
  12. 12. McDonald SP, Russ GR. Burden of end-stage renal disease among indigenous peoples in Australia and New Zealand. Kidney International Supplements. 2003;(83):S123–S127.
  13. 13. Radhakrishnan J, Remuzzi G, Saran R, et al. Taming the chronic kidney disease epidemic: a global view of surveillance efforts. Kidney International. 2014;86(2):246–250.
  14. 14. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). Australian Guidelines to Reduce Health Risks from Drinking Alcohol. Canberra: NHMRC; 2020.
  15. 15. Ranganathan D, John GT, Jose M, et al. Australian peritoneal dialysis outcomes: a multicentre study. Nephrology. 2021;26(10):802–810.