📋 Key Information Summary
- Prostate cancer is the most common non-skin cancer in Australian men, with 1 in 6 diagnosed by age 85.
- Risk is increased by age, family history (especially BRCA1/2 mutations), and African ancestry.
- Diagnosis hinges on a combination of PSA level, digital rectal examination (DRE), and prostate biopsy.
- Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is a key staging and risk-stratification tool, widely available in Australia.
- The Gleason score (and newer ISUP Grade Groups) is the primary histopathological prognostic factor.
- TNM staging, PSA level, and Gleason score combine to define risk groups (low, intermediate, high) that guide management.
- Active surveillance is the standard of care for most men with low-risk, localised disease to avoid overtreatment.
- Definitive treatment options include radical prostatectomy (open/robotic) and radiotherapy (external beam or brachytherapy).
- Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is used in combination with radiotherapy for intermediate/high-risk localised disease and as first-line for metastatic disease.
- Novel imaging with PSMA-PET/CT has revolutionised staging for intermediate and high-risk disease, replacing many conventional scans.
- Treatment decisions are complex and require shared decision-making, considering cancer risk, patient age, comorbidities, and quality-of-life preferences.
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander men have higher prostate cancer mortality and face significant barriers to timely diagnosis and care.
Introduction & Australian Epidemiology
Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in Australian men and the third most common cause of cancer death. It is a significant public health challenge, with management evolving from a one-size-fits-all approach to highly personalised, risk-stratified care. The cornerstone of modern management is accurate staging and risk assessment, guiding the critical decision between active surveillance, curative-intent therapy, and palliative management.
In Australia, the age-standardised incidence rate is approximately 180 per 100,000 men, with a lifetime risk of about 1 in 6. Mortality has been steadily declining due to earlier detection and improved treatments. However, significant disparities exist, particularly for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander men, who are often diagnosed at a later stage and have poorer survival outcomes.
Epidemiology & Risk Factors
Age is the strongest risk factor, with incidence rising sharply after age 50. Other established risk factors include:
- Family History: Having a first-degree relative (father, brother) with prostate cancer doubles the risk. Risk increases further with multiple affected relatives or early onset in relatives. Germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, and HOXB13 confer a significantly elevated lifetime risk.
- Ethnicity: Men of African ancestry have the highest global incidence. In Australia, incidence is slightly lower in men of Asian descent.
- Other Factors: Obesity is associated with higher-grade, more aggressive disease. There is no definitive evidence linking vasectomy, BPH, or specific dietary factors to causation, though lifestyle factors may influence progression.
Pathology & Gleason Grading
Over 95% of prostate cancers are adenocarcinomas. Histological grading is the single most important prognostic factor for localised disease.
The Gleason Score is determined by the pathologist assessing the two most prevalent glandular patterns (1-5) in the biopsy sample. The primary and secondary patterns are added to give a score (e.g., 3+4=7). Pattern 5 is the most poorly differentiated and aggressive.
ISUP Grade Groups (2014): To improve clinical clarity, Gleason scores have been condensed into five prognostic Grade Groups:
| ISUP Grade Group | Gleason Score | Prognosis |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ≤ 6 (3+3) | Low risk, excellent prognosis |
| 2 | 7 (3+4) | Favourable intermediate risk |
| 3 | 7 (4+3) | Unfavourable intermediate risk |
| 4 | 8 | High risk |
| 5 | 9-10 | Very high risk |
Investigations (PSA, Biopsy & Imaging)
Management (Surveillance, Surgery, Radiotherapy & ADT)
Management is determined by risk stratification, patient fitness, and life expectancy.
Key Treatment Modalities
Prostate cancer outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander men are significantly worse than for non-Indigenous Australians, driven by later presentation, barriers to accessing specialist care, and higher comorbidity burdens.
📚 References
- 1. Cancer Australia. Prostate cancer in Australia statistics. Australian Government. https://www.cancerdata.gov.au/prostate (accessed 2024).
- 2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Prostate cancer in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Cat. no. CAN 133. Canberra: AIHW; 2021.
- 3. Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia and Cancer Council Australia. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer. 2021.
- 4. Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer—2023 Update. European Urology. 2023;84(2):208-222.
- 5. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). PSA testing and early management of test-detected prostate cancer: A consumer guide. 2016.
- 6. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR). Prostate external beam radiotherapy treatment guidelines. 2022.
- 7. Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA). Lancet. 2020;395(10231):1208-1216.
- 8. Department of Health (Australia). Medical Benefits Schedule (MBS) Item 63464, 66645, 37226. Australian Government.
- 9. Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). Zoladex (goserelin) and other LHRH analogues. Australian Government.
- 10. Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ). Position statement on active surveillance for prostate cancer. 2023.