📋 Key Information Summary
- Chronic pain is defined as pain persisting or recurring for ≥3 months, affecting approximately 3.4 million Australians and representing one of the most common reasons for primary care consultation.
- Pain categories include acute (nociceptive, tissue-injury related, self-limiting), chronic (persistent, often maladaptive neuroplastic changes), and cancer-related (may be nociceptive, neuropactic, or mixed).
- The transition from acute to chronic pain involves peripheral and central sensitisation, neuroplastic remodelling, psychosocial amplification, and loss of descending inhibitory modulation — early intervention can interrupt this cascade.
- Use validated assessment tools: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS 0–10), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and body charts to localise pain; assess function, mood, sleep, and quality of life simultaneously.
- Adopt a biopsychosocial model — multidimensional assessment incorporating physical, psychological, social, and occupational domains is essential for effective management.
- Non-pharmacological therapies are first-line: education, graded exercise, cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), physiotherapy, sleep hygiene, and mindfulness-based stress reduction.
- Pharmacotherapy should be adjunctive: paracetamol and NSAIDs for nociceptive pain; amitriptyline, duloxetine, or pregabalin/gabapentin for neuropathic pain; opioids only for short-term or cancer-related pain under strict criteria.
- Opioid prescribing requires careful risk–benefit analysis, informed consent, regular review, and adherence to RACGP Prescribing Drugs of Dependence guidelines; avoid dose escalation beyond 50 mg morphine equivalent daily (MED) without specialist review.
- Multidisciplinary pain management programs (MMPs) combining physical, psychological, and pharmacological interventions produce the best long-term outcomes; refer to specialist pain services when primary care management is insufficient.
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians experience chronic pain at 1.4× the rate of non-Indigenous Australians; culturally safe, trauma-informed care and community-based models are essential.
- Regularly reassess treatment goals — focus on functional improvement and quality of life rather than numerical pain scores alone; set SMART goals with patients.
- Document pain management plans, reassess at defined intervals, and use real-time prescription monitoring (RTPM) systems such as SafeScript or ScriptCheck when prescribing Schedule 8 medicines.
Introduction & Australian Epidemiology
Chronic pain is a major public health challenge in Australia and globally. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) revised its definition in 2020 to describe chronic pain as "pain that persists or recurs for longer than 3 months," distinguishing it from acute pain, which serves as a physiological warning signal of tissue damage.
In Australia, the 2020 National Study of Mental Health and Wellbeing and AIHW data estimate that approximately 3.4 million Australians (16% of the population) live with chronic pain. Prevalence increases sharply with age — affecting over 30% of adults aged 65 years and older. Chronic pain is the leading cause of early retirement, disability pension, and reduced workforce participation, costing the Australian economy an estimated 9.3 billion annually in direct healthcare costs, lost productivity, and carer burden (PainAustralia, 2019).
In general practice, chronic pain accounts for approximately 1 in 5 consultations. Despite this, evidence consistently demonstrates gaps in pain education — many Australian GP trainees report inadequate undergraduate and vocational training in pain science. The RACGP and the Faculty of Pain Medicine (FPM) of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) have published frameworks to support evidence-based, patient-centred chronic pain management at the primary care level.
The burden falls disproportionately on certain populations: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, people from low socioeconomic backgrounds, those in rural and remote areas with limited access to multidisciplinary services, older adults, and individuals with comorbid mental health conditions. Inequities in access to specialist pain services remain a significant concern, particularly in regional and remote Australia where wait times of 12–18 months are common.
Categories of Pain
Understanding pain mechanisms is fundamental to appropriate classification, investigation, and treatment. Pain is classified by duration (acute vs chronic), mechanism (nociceptive, neuropathic, nociplastic), and aetiology (cancer vs non-cancer). These categories overlap, and many patients present with mixed pain phenotypes.
Acute Pain
Acute pain is a normal physiological response to tissue injury or potential tissue damage. It is typically self-limiting, proportional to the stimulus, and resolves with healing (usually within 1–3 months). Examples include post-operative pain, acute musculoskeletal injury, renal colic, and acute infection.
Pathophysiology: Activation of peripheral nociceptors (Aδ and C fibres) by mechanical, thermal, or chemical stimuli. Transduction → transmission → modulation → perception. Peripheral sensitisation lowers nociceptor thresholds at the injury site (primary hyperalgesia).
Management principle: Treat the underlying cause; provide effective, timely analgesia to prevent central sensitisation; use multimodal analgesia; avoid unnecessary opioid prescribing.
Chronic Pain
Chronic pain persists beyond normal tissue healing time (≥3 months) and is often disproportionate to identifiable pathology. It may arise from persistent nociceptive input, neuropathic damage, or maladaptive neuroplastic changes in the absence of ongoing tissue injury.
Subtypes by mechanism:
- Nociceptive: Ongoing activation of nociceptors by tissue damage or inflammation (e.g., osteoarthritis, chronic inflammatory arthritis, endometriosis). Responsive to NSAIDs and simple analgesics.
- Neuropathic: Caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. Descriptors include burning, shooting, electric-shock-like, tingling, and numbness. Affects approximately 17–26% of chronic pain patients. Common causes: diabetic peripheral neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia, radiculopathy, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, spinal cord injury. Responds to specific agents (amitriptyline, duloxetine, pregabalin, gabapentin).
- Nociplastic (central sensitisation): Pain arising from altered nociception without clear evidence of tissue damage or somatosensory lesion. Conditions include fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), chronic tension-type headache, non-specific chronic low back pain. Characterised by widespread hyperalgesia, allodynia, and disproportionate pain. Responds poorly to opioids; best managed with exercise, CBT, and centrally-acting agents.
| Feature | Nociceptive | Neuropathic | Nociplastic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source | Tissue damage/inflammation | Nerve lesion/disease | Altered CNS processing |
| Character | Aching, throbbing, sharp | Burning, shooting, electric | Diffuse, deep aching, pressure |
| Distribution | Localised, dermatomal/myotomal | Dermatomal or peripheral nerve | Widespread, variable |
| Neuro signs | None | Sensory loss, allodynia, hyperalgesia | Tenderness, widespread allodynia |
| Responsive to | NSAIDs, paracetamol, opioids | TCAs, SNRIs, gabapentinoids | Exercise, CBT, duloxetine, low-dose amitriptyline |
Cancer Pain
Cancer pain is a distinct category with unique considerations. It may be caused by the tumour itself (compression, infiltration of nerves/bone/viscera, obstruction), cancer treatment (chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, radiation fibrosis, post-surgical pain), or comorbid conditions. Approximately 55–70% of patients with advanced cancer experience significant pain.
Unlike non-cancer chronic pain, cancer pain generally has identifiable ongoing nociceptive pathology and often requires opioid analgesia titrated to effect. The WHO Analgesic Ladder (1986) remains a useful framework — adapted to modern practice with adjuvant agents used at all steps, not just Step 3.
Step 1 — Mild pain (NRS 1–3): Paracetamol ± NSAID + adjuvants
Step 2 — Moderate pain (NRS 4–6): Low-dose opioid (codeine 30–60 mg or tramadol 50–100 mg) + paracetamol ± NSAID + adjuvants
Step 3 — Severe pain (NRS 7–10): Strong opioid (morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl) + paracetamol ± NSAID + adjuvants
Cancer survivors may also develop chronic pain syndromes after treatment completion, including aromatase inhibitor-associated musculoskeletal syndrome (AIMSS), chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), post-mastectomy pain syndrome, and radiation-induced brachial plexopathy. These require ongoing management in primary care with specialist oncology input as needed.
Transition from Acute to Chronic Pain
The progression from acute to chronic pain is not simply a matter of duration — it involves fundamental changes in neural processing, psychological state, and social functioning. Understanding this transition is critical for early identification and prevention.
Neurobiological Mechanisms
- Peripheral sensitisation: Inflammatory mediators (prostaglandins, bradykinin, substance P, NGF) lower nociceptor activation thresholds at the injury site. This is reversible and normally resolves with tissue healing.
- Central sensitisation: Persistent nociceptive input leads to increased excitability of dorsal horn neurons via NMDA receptor activation, wind-up phenomenon, and expansion of receptive fields. Results in hyperalgesia and allodynia in areas beyond the original injury. This is the hallmark of the transition to chronic pain.
- Neuroplastic remodelling: Chronic nociceptive input reorganises cortical maps (somatosensory cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex), leading to altered pain perception and emotional processing.
- Loss of descending inhibition: Descending inhibitory pathways from the periaqueductal grey (PAG) and rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) become dysfunctional, reducing endogenous analgesia (conditioned pain modulation failure).
- Neuroimmune interactions: Microglial activation in the spinal cord and brain release pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6), perpetuating central sensitisation.
Psychosocial Risk Factors (Yellow Flags)
Psychosocial factors are stronger predictors of chronic pain development than biomedical findings. Australian guidelines identify "yellow flags" that increase the risk of chronification:
| Yellow Flag Domain | Examples |
|---|---|
| Beliefs & attitudes | Catastrophising ("I'll never get better"), fear-avoidance beliefs, belief that pain = damage |
| Emotional state | Depression, anxiety, anger, helplessness |
| Behaviour | Withdrawal from activity, excessive rest, over-reliance on passive treatments |
| Workplace | Job dissatisfaction, lack of modified duties, compensation/disputes |
| Social | Social isolation, unsupportive family, secondary gain |
Prevention Strategies
Preventing chronification requires a proactive approach in the acute pain phase:
- Adequate, multimodal acute pain control to minimise peripheral and central sensitisation
- Patient education — explain that pain does not equal harm; encourage graded return to activity
- Address yellow flags early — refer for psychological support if catastrophising or fear-avoidance present
- Avoid unnecessary investigations (imaging without clinical indication reinforces the "damage" narrative)
- Maintain function as a primary goal, not pain elimination
- Limit opioid prescribing for acute pain — use time-limited prescriptions with clear cessation plans
- Schedule follow-up to monitor trajectory — pain not improving at 4–6 weeks warrants reassessment
Assessing & Measuring Pain
Pain assessment in chronic pain must go beyond the question "How bad is your pain?" A comprehensive, multidimensional assessment is the foundation of effective management. The Australian Pain Society and RACGP recommend structured assessment covering intensity, quality, location, functional impact, and psychosocial factors.
Unidimensional Pain Intensity Tools
Useful for initial screening and monitoring response to treatment over time:
- Numeric Rating Scale (NRS 0–10): Most widely used in Australian primary care. Patient rates pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Mild (1–3), moderate (4–6), severe (7–10). Quick, validated, easy to track.
- Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): 100 mm horizontal line from "no pain" to "worst pain." More sensitive to change but less practical in some settings.
- Verbal Rating Scale (VRS): Categorical (none, mild, moderate, severe). Useful for patients with cognitive impairment or language barriers.
- Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Scale: Preferred for paediatric patients (≥3 years), older adults with cognitive impairment, and patients with limited English proficiency.
Multidimensional Pain Assessment Tools
| Tool | Domains Assessed | Setting | Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) | Pain intensity, interference with function (7 domains), pain location, treatments | Primary care, pain clinics | 5–10 min |
| Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) | Screening for neuropathic pain (interview + physical exam items) | Any setting | 2–5 min |
| PainDETECT | Self-report neuropathic pain screening | Primary care | 5 min |
| Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire | Risk of chronification (yellow flags, function, beliefs) | Primary care, physiotherapy | 5–10 min |
| STarT Back Screening Tool | Low back pain prognosis (psychosocial risk stratification) | GP, physiotherapy | 2–5 min |
| EQ-5D-5L | Quality of life (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) | Research, health economics | 5 min |
Body Charts
Body charts (pain body diagrams) are a simple, highly effective clinical tool for pain assessment. The patient marks the location, distribution, and character of their pain on an anatomical diagram. Body charts help:
- Localise and differentiate pain patterns (dermatomal vs diffuse vs regional)
- Identify neuropathic distributions (e.g., L5 radiculopathy vs lateral thigh meralgia paraesthetica)
- Monitor changes over time (comparison at follow-up visits)
- Detect widespread pain patterns suggestive of central sensitisation/fibromyalgia (≥4 of 5 body regions)
- Facilitate communication between the patient and multidisciplinary team members
Neuropathic Pain Screening
The DN4 questionnaire (Douleur Neuropathique 4 items) is the preferred screening tool recommended by the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group (NeuPSIG). A score ≥4/10 suggests neuropathic pain. Components include:
- Interview: burning, painful cold, electric shocks, tingling, pins and needles, numbness, itching
- Examination: hypoesthesia to touch, hypoesthesia to pinprick, allodynia (brushing)
The PainDETECT questionnaire is an alternative self-report tool (score ≥19 suggests neuropathic pain; ≤12 suggests nociceptive pain; 13–18 is ambiguous).
Comprehensive Pain Assessment Framework
Australian guidelines recommend a structured biopsychosocial assessment at the initial chronic pain consultation:
- Biological: Pain character, onset, duration, aggravating/relieving factors, prior investigations/treatments, comorbidities, sleep quality, medication history (including over-the-counter and complementary), substance use
- Psychological: Mood (PHQ-9 for depression, GAD-7 for anxiety), catastrophising (Pain Catastrophising Scale), self-efficacy, beliefs about pain, coping strategies, history of trauma/PTSD
- Social: Impact on work/education, relationship quality, financial stress, social support, cultural factors, compensation/litigation status
- Functional: Activities of daily living, exercise capacity, occupational demands, goals for recovery
Non-Pharmacological Management
Non-pharmacological therapies are the cornerstone of chronic pain management. International and Australian guidelines consistently recommend them as first-line or foundational interventions, with pharmacotherapy used as adjunctive support. The evidence base for physical, psychological, and self-management strategies has grown substantially.
Pain Education
Pain neuroscience education (PNE) — also known as pain neuroscience education or explanatory pain neuroscience — involves teaching patients about the neurobiology of pain, including the distinction between tissue damage and pain perception, the role of central sensitisation, and the modifiability of pain. Systematic reviews demonstrate that PNE reduces pain catastrophising, improves function, and enhances engagement with active rehabilitation.
- Key messages: "Pain is not always a reliable indicator of tissue damage," "The nervous system can become overprotective," "Your brain can learn to turn the pain volume down"
- Resources: Explain Pain (Butler & Moseley), PainAustralia patient resources, Pain Health (WA Government)
- MBS items: GP Management Plans (GPMP, MBS item 721) and Team Care Arrangements (TCA, MBS item 723) facilitate structured care coordination with allied health
Physical Activity & Exercise
Graded exercise therapy is one of the most evidence-supported interventions for chronic pain. Exercise reduces pain intensity, improves function, enhances mood, and addresses deconditioning. The key principle is graded exposure — starting at a tolerable level and progressively increasing activity.
| Exercise Type | Evidence | Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Aerobic (walking, swimming, cycling) | Strong evidence for pain reduction and mood improvement | Chronic low back pain, fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, widespread pain |
| Resistance/strength training | Improves function and reduces pain in musculoskeletal conditions | Knee/hip OA, chronic low back pain |
| Yoga, Pilates, tai chi | Moderate evidence for chronic low back pain and fibromyalgia | Low back pain, fibromyalgia, general chronic pain |
| Aquatic/hydrotherapy | Good for patients unable to tolerate land-based exercise | Fibromyalgia, OA, chronic widespread pain |
MBS items for exercise physiology services (MBS item 10952–10954) are accessible via GP Management Plans. Physiotherapy services are rebatable under private health insurance and under Medicare with TCA referrals (up to 5 allied health services per calendar year, MBS item 10950–10970).
Psychological Therapies
Psychological interventions address the cognitive, emotional, and behavioural dimensions of chronic pain:
- Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT): Strongest evidence base. Addresses maladaptive thoughts (catastrophising, fear-avoidance), promotes activity pacing, graded exposure, and coping skills. Delivered by clinical psychologists. Medicare Better Access (MBS items 80100–80171) provides up to 10 sessions per calendar year (20 sessions under exceptional circumstances).
- Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT): Focuses on psychological flexibility, acceptance of pain, and engagement in valued activities despite pain. Growing evidence, particularly for conditions with central sensitisation.
- Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR): 8-week group programme incorporating mindfulness meditation, body scanning, and gentle yoga. Moderate evidence for chronic pain reduction and improved quality of life.
- Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) & Mirror Therapy: Particularly effective for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and phantom limb pain. Involves laterality recognition, explicit motor imagery, and mirror therapy in sequence.
Physical Therapies
- Physiotherapy: Manual therapy, exercise prescription, education, and pain neuroscience education. Evidence strongest when combined with active exercise programmes rather than passive treatments alone.
- Occupational therapy: Functional assessment, workplace ergonomic modification, activity pacing, and adaptive equipment prescription.
- Acupuncture: Moderate evidence for chronic low back pain, knee osteoarthritis, and headache. May be used as adjunct; available under some private health insurance extras cover.
- Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): Low-to-moderate evidence. Self-administered, low risk. May provide short-term symptom relief. Not PBS-listed; devices available for purchase or loan from some community health services.
Multidisciplinary Pain Management Programmes (MMPs)
MMPs combine physical, psychological, educational, and pharmacological interventions delivered by a coordinated team (typically including a pain medicine specialist, physiotherapist, psychologist, occupational therapist, and nurse). They represent the most effective intervention for complex chronic pain, with evidence demonstrating improvements in pain, function, mood, medication use, and healthcare utilisation. Available at public hospital pain clinics and some private pain management centres across Australia. Wait times in the public system can exceed 6–18 months.
Pharmacological Management
Pharmacotherapy in chronic pain should be adjunctive to non-pharmacological strategies, not a replacement. The goal is to reduce pain sufficiently to enable engagement in rehabilitation, improve function, and enhance quality of life — not necessarily to achieve a pain-free state. Medication selection should target the underlying pain mechanism, consider comorbidities, and follow a stepwise approach.
Simple Analgesics
Neuropathic Pain Agents
Topical Agents
Opioid Analgesics
Adjuvant Agents
Medications to Avoid or Use with Extreme Caution
- Benzodiazepines: No evidence for efficacy in chronic pain. Significant harms (dependence, falls, cognitive impairment, respiratory depression with opioids). Avoid for pain management. Taper if already prescribed.
- Soma® (carisoprodol): Not available in Australia. Sedative with abuse potential. Not recommended.
- Long-term opioids without review: All opioids for chronic non-cancer pain require regular review (minimum every 3 months), defined goals, and documented informed consent via an opioid management agreement.
Opioid Deprescribing
Patients on long-term opioids who have not achieved functional improvement, or who wish to reduce, should be supported with a structured tapering plan. Taper by 10% of the original dose every 2–4 weeks; slower tapers (5–10% per month) for patients on high doses or with long duration of use. Monitor for withdrawal symptoms, pain recurrence, and mood changes. Consider referral to a drug and alcohol service or specialist pain service for complex tapers.
Monitoring
Regular monitoring is essential in chronic pain management to evaluate treatment efficacy, detect adverse effects, and ensure treatment goals are being met. Monitoring should be proactive, structured, and patient-centred.
Monitoring Framework
| Domain | Tool / Measure | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Pain intensity | NRS 0–10, BPI | Every visit; at least every 3 months |
| Function | BPI interference subscale, Patient-Specific Functional Scale | Every 1–3 months |
| Mood | PHQ-9 (depression), GAD-7 (anxiety) | Every 3–6 months; more often if mood instability |
| Sleep | Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), single-item screening | Every 3 months |
| Quality of life | EQ-5D-5L | 6–12 monthly |
| Medication safety | Medication review, renal/hepatic function, urine drug screen (if opioids) | Every 3–6 months |
| Opioid-specific | Morphine equivalent daily dose (MED), aberrant behaviour screening, naloxone co-prescription | Every prescription; minimum every 3 months |
Treatment Goals
Goals should be SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) and agreed upon collaboratively with the patient. Examples:
- "Walk for 20 minutes 3 days per week within 6 weeks"
- "Return to part-time work within 3 months"
- "Reduce pain-related catastrophising score by 30% within 8 weeks"
- "Reduce opioid dose by 20% over 3 months while maintaining function"
- "Improve sleep quality — sleeping ≥6 hours uninterrupted by 6 weeks"
When to Refer to Specialist Pain Services
- Pain not responding to 3–6 months of primary care management
- Suspected neuropathic pain requiring specialist confirmation or interventional approaches
- Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)
- Opioid dose escalation beyond 50 mg MED/day without functional improvement
- Significant psychological comorbidity (PTSD, severe depression, suicidal ideation)
- Need for multidisciplinary pain programme
- Medicolegal or compensation-related complexity
- Diagnostic uncertainty requiring advanced investigations (e.g., nerve conduction studies, MRI)
Real-Time Prescription Monitoring (RTPM)
All Australian states and territories have implemented or are implementing real-time prescription monitoring systems (SafeScript in Victoria, ScriptCheck in NSW/NT, QScript in Queensland, SCRIPTCheckWA in WA, Controlled Drugs Database in SA/Tasmania/ACT). These systems are mandatory to check before prescribing Schedule 8 medicines and are strongly recommended for Schedule 4 opioids and benzodiazepines. They help identify doctor/pharmacy shopping, polypharmacy risks, and potential overdose risk.
Special Populations
Pregnancy
Paediatrics
Older Adults (≥65 years)
Renal Impairment
Hepatic Impairment
Immunocompromised
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Considerations
Chronic pain is a significant health burden for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. The 2018–19 National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Survey found that approximately 28% of Indigenous Australians reported having chronic pain, compared to 16% of non-Indigenous Australians — a prevalence ratio of 1.4–1.8×. Chronic pain contributes to substantial disability, reduced workforce participation, psychological distress, and reduced life expectancy.
Key resources for practitioners:
- Lowitja Institute — Research and resources for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health
- NACCHO (National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation) — Clinical resources and health promotion
- RACGP Specific Interests: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health — Practice guidance
- PainAustralia — Fact Sheets — Including culturally relevant pain management information
- Indigenous Allied Health Australia (IAHA) — Allied health workforce and culturally safe practice
📚 References
- 1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Chronic pain in Australia. Cat. no. PHE 267. Canberra: AIHW; 2020.
- 2. PainAustralia. The cost of pain in Australia. Sydney: PainAustralia; 2019.
- 3. Nicholas MK, Blyth FM. Are self-management strategies effective in chronic pain treatment? Pain Manag. 2016;6(1):75–88.
- 4. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP). Prescribing drugs of dependence in general practice, Part B: Benzodiazepines. Melbourne: RACGP; 2015 (updated 2022).
- 5. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP). Prescribing drugs of dependence in general practice, Part C1: Opioids. Melbourne: RACGP; 2022.
- 6. Faculty of Pain Medicine, Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (FPM ANZCA). Recommendations regarding the use of opioid analgesics in patients with chronic non-cancer pain. Melbourne: FPM ANZCA; 2022.
- 7. Finnerup NB, Attal N, Haroutounian S, et al. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(2):162–173.
- 8. Dworkin RH, O'Connor AB, Kent J, et al. Interventional management of neuropathic pain: NeuPSIG recommendations. Pain. 2013;154(11):2249–2261.
- 9. Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D, et al. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2368–2383.
- 10. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. 2nd ed. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2021.
- 11. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. Canberra: NHMRC; 2023 (updated).
- 12. Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(9):CD000963.
- 13. de C Williams AC, Fisher E, Hearn L, Eccleston C. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;(8):CD007407.
- 14. Geneen LJ, Moore RA, Clarke C, et al. Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(1):CD011279.
- 15. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Survey, 2018–19. Cat. no. 4715.0. Canberra: ABS; 2019.