📋 Key Information Summary
- Neuropathic pain arises from a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system, affecting an estimated 5–8% of the Australian population and increasing with age.
- Characterised by spontaneous burning, shooting, electric-shock sensations and evoked phenomena including allodynia (pain from a normally non-painful stimulus) and hyperalgesia (exaggerated pain response).
- Screen with the DN4 questionnaire (score ≥ 4/10 suggestive) or painDETECT (≥ 19/38); clinical examination should include bedside sensory testing with brush, pin, cold, and vibration.
- First-line pharmacological adjuvants are TCA (amitriptyline) or SNRI (duloxetine); gabapentinoids (pregabalin, gabapentin) are alternatives, particularly for peripheral neuropathic pain.
- All first-line agents are PBS Authority Required for neuropathic pain — initiate at low dose and titrate slowly over weeks to balance efficacy and tolerability.
- Opioids are NOT first-line and should only be considered short-term when adjuvants fail; long-term opioid therapy for neuropathic pain has limited evidence and significant harm.
- Topical agents — capsaicin 8% patch (Qutenza®) and lidocaine 5% patch — are useful for localised peripheral neuropathic pain (e.g. post-herpetic neuralgia).
- Combination therapy (e.g. TCA + gabapentinoid) may be needed when monotherapy is inadequate; trial each agent for at least 6–8 weeks at therapeutic dose before switching.
- Non-pharmacological approaches — CBT-based pain management, graded motor imagery, exercise therapy, and TENS — are integral to multidisciplinary care.
- Procedural options (nerve blocks, spinal cord stimulation, pulsed radiofrequency) are reserved for refractory cases and require specialist referral through a multidisciplinary pain service.
- Trigeminal neuralgia is a unique entity — carbamazepine (or oxcarbazepine) is first-line; MRI brain with posterior fossa views is mandatory to exclude secondary causes.
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians have higher prevalence of diabetic neuropathy and post-herpetic neuralgia; culturally safe screening and access to specialist pain services must be prioritised.
Introduction & Australian Epidemiology
Neuropathic pain is defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) as pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. It is distinct from nociceptive pain and requires a fundamentally different approach to assessment and management. This article covers clinical features, validated screening tools, pharmacological adjuvants, and procedural interventions relevant to Australian primary care and specialist practice.
In Australia, population-based studies estimate that neuropathic pain affects approximately 5–8% of adults, with higher prevalence in those over 65 years and in people living with diabetes mellitus. The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) reports that chronic pain conditions, including neuropathic pain, account for a substantial burden of disease and are a leading cause of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs).
Common aetiologies encountered in Australian practice include:
- Peripheral: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (most common cause nationally), post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN), chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), HIV-associated neuropathy, post-surgical neuropathy, radiculopathy, nerve entrapment.
- Central: Post-stroke pain, spinal cord injury pain, multiple sclerosis-related pain.
- Mixed: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), trigeminal neuralgia.
The economic burden is significant: chronic neuropathic pain costs the Australian healthcare system an estimated billion annually when direct healthcare costs, lost productivity, and informal care are included (Painaustralia, 2019). Multidisciplinary management in line with the National Strategic Action Plan for Pain Management (2019) is the recommended approach.
Clinical Features
Neuropathic pain has characteristic clinical features that distinguish it from nociceptive pain. A thorough history and focused neurological examination are essential for diagnosis.
Spontaneous (Ongoing) Symptoms
- Burning pain: Continuous or intermittent burning sensation, often described as "hot water" or "sunburn" — most common descriptor in diabetic neuropathy and PHN.
- Shooting / lancinating pain: Brief, sharp, electric-shock-like pains; characteristic of trigeminal neuralgia and diabetic neuropathy.
- Tingling and paraesthesiae: "Pins and needles," numbness, or a sensation of ants crawling (formication).
- Dysaesthesiae: Unpleasant, abnormal sensations that may be continuous or provoked.
Evoked Phenomena
| Phenomenon | Definition | Bedside Test | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allodynia | Pain from a stimulus that does not normally provoke pain | Light cotton-wool brush across affected area | Indicates central sensitisation; common in CRPS, PHN |
| Static mechanical hyperalgesia | Increased pain to a mild pressure stimulus | Finger pressure over affected dermatome | Peripheral sensitisation; seen in peripheral nerve injury |
| Pin-prick hyperalgesia | Exaggerated pain response to a pin-prick | Standard neurological pin or toothpick | Indicates central sensitisation spreading beyond lesion zone |
| Cold allodynia | Pain from a cool (non-noxious) stimulus | Cold metal tuning fork or tube | Suggests C-fibre involvement; seen in peripheral neuropathy |
| Temporal summation | Increasing pain with repetitive stimuli (wind-up) | Repeated pin-prick at 1 Hz over 30 seconds | Central sensitisation; predictor of treatment difficulty |
Neurological Examination Findings
A focused examination should assess:
- Sensory testing: Light touch (cotton wool), pin-prick, temperature (cold tuning fork or thermal rollers), vibration (128 Hz tuning fork on bony prominence), and joint position sense in a stocking-and-glove or dermatomal distribution.
- Motor examination: Assess for weakness (suggests large-fibre involvement or motor neuropathy), e.g. foot drop in common peroneal neuropathy.
- Reflexes: Diminished or absent ankle reflexes are an early sign of large-fibre diabetic neuropathy.
- Autonomic features: Skin colour changes, temperature asymmetry, sweating abnormalities, oedema — particularly relevant in CRPS.
Common Presentations by Aetiology
| Condition | Typical Distribution | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Diabetic peripheral neuropathy | Stocking-and-glove, distal symmetric | Burning feet, nocturnal worsening, loss of ankle reflexes |
| Post-herpetic neuralgia | Dermatomal (thoracic > trigeminal) | Persistent pain > 3 months after acute herpes zoster; allodynia common |
| Trigeminal neuralgia | V2/V3 distribution (unilateral) | Brief electric-shock-like paroxysms triggered by touch, chewing, wind |
| CIPN | Stocking-and-glove (dose-dependent) | Numbness, tingling, burning; associated with platinum/taxane agents |
| CRPS | Single limb (distal) | Disproportionate pain, swelling, colour/temperature change, motor dysfunction after injury |
| Central post-stroke pain | Hemibody contralateral to lesion | Burning, dysaesthesia; onset weeks–months post-stroke |
Screening Tools
Validated screening tools help differentiate neuropathic from nociceptive pain in primary care settings. While no single tool replaces a thorough clinical assessment, these instruments improve diagnostic accuracy and guide referral decisions.
| Tool | Items | Scoring | Cut-off | Setting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DN4 (Douleur Neuropathique 4) | 10 items (interview + exam) | 0–10 | ≥ 4 = neuropathic pain likely | Primary care & specialist; most widely validated |
| painDETECT (PD-Q) | 9 items (self-report) | 0–38 | ≥ 19 = neuropathic; ≤ 12 = nociceptive; 13–18 = ambiguous | Primary care screening; no physical examination required |
| LANSS (Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs) | 7 items (5 symptoms + 2 clinical) | 0–24 | ≥ 12 = neuropathic pain likely | Research and clinical; requires bedside sensory testing |
| NPQ (Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire) | 12 items (self-report) | Algorithm-based | Score > 0 = neuropathic component | Clinical and research use |
| S-LANSS (Self-report LANSS) | 7 items (self-report only) | 0–24 | ≥ 12 = neuropathic pain likely | Telephone or remote screening; useful for telehealth |
When to Screen
- All patients with diabetes presenting with new lower-limb pain or paraesthesiae.
- Patients > 3 months post-herpes zoster with ongoing pain.
- Cancer survivors completing neurotoxic chemotherapy (platinum agents, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, bortezomib).
- Patients with persistent post-surgical pain (e.g. post-thoracotomy, post-mastectomy, post-inguinal hernia repair).
- Patients with chronic low back pain who report shooting/radiating leg symptoms — to assess for radicular neuropathic component.
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)
QST is a specialist investigation available at major tertiary pain centres in Australia (e.g. Royal North Shore Hospital, Pain Management Research Institute – Sydney; Alfred Hospital – Melbourne). It objectively maps sensory thresholds and can differentiate between small-fibre and large-fibre dysfunction. QST is not routinely required for diagnosis but may assist in complex or medicolegal cases. Referral via MBS specialist consultation items (104, 105) may apply.
Pharmacological Adjuvants
Adjuvant analgesics are the mainstay of neuropathic pain pharmacotherapy. These agents were originally developed for other indications (depression, epilepsy) but have demonstrated efficacy in neuropathic pain through modulation of descending inhibitory pathways, sodium channel blockade, or reduction of central sensitisation. Australian Therapeutic Guidelines recommend a stepwise approach with monotherapy first, adequate trial duration (6–8 weeks at therapeutic dose), and combination therapy for refractory cases.
First-Line Agents
Second-Line / Alternative First-Line Agents
Third-Line and Adjunctive Agents
Topical Agents
Recommended Treatment Algorithm
Procedural Options
Procedural interventions are reserved for patients with refractory neuropathic pain that has not responded to adequate pharmacological therapy (typically ≥ 2 adjuvant agents at therapeutic doses for ≥ 3 months each). These interventions are performed by pain medicine specialists, typically within a multidisciplinary pain service at an Australian hospital or specialist clinic.
Interventional Procedures
| Procedure | Indication | Mechanism | Evidence Level | Australian Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nerve blocks (local anaesthetic ± corticosteroid) | Localised peripheral neuropathic pain, PHN (intercostal, trigeminal), CRPS, ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric neuropathy | Interrupts nociceptive transmission; reduces peripheral sensitisation | Moderate (for PHN, CRPS) | Widely available; performed under ultrasound/fluoroscopy guidance in public and private settings |
| Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) | Trigeminal neuralgia, occipital neuralgia, post-surgical neuropathy, radicular pain | Modulates nerve function without thermal destruction; reversible | Moderate (growing evidence) | Available at major pain centres; MBS item 18350 (radiofrequency lesion) |
| Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) | Failed back surgery syndrome, CRPS (types I & II), refractory peripheral neuropathic pain | Gate control theory; activates dorsal column Aβ fibres to inhibit pain transmission; newer high-frequency (HF10) and burst modes available | High (RCT evidence for CRPS, FBSS) | Available at tertiary centres (Royal North Shore, Alfred, Royal Adelaide, Fiona Stanley); trial period (5–7 days) before permanent implant; MBS item 18360 |
| Intrathecal drug delivery | Severe refractory cancer and non-cancer neuropathic pain | Delivers low-dose opioids, local anaesthetic, ziconotide directly to spinal cord receptors | Moderate | Limited availability; tertiary centres only; significant cost and follow-up requirements |
| Botulinum toxin A (subcutaneous) | Peripheral neuropathic pain (PHN, painful diabetic neuropathy, post-traumatic neuropathy) | Inhibits release of CGRP, substance P, glutamate; reduces peripheral sensitisation | Moderate (multiple RCTs) | Off-label use; specialist initiation; Botox® or Dysport® — not PBS-subsidised for neuropathic pain |
| Sympathetic nerve blocks | CRPS (early intervention), sympathetically maintained pain | Interrupts sympathetic–nociceptive coupling | Moderate (for CRPS, best early) | Stellate ganglion block (upper limb) and lumbar sympathetic block (lower limb); available at major pain centres |
Non-Pharmacological, Non-Procedural Therapies
These should be integrated at all stages of management and are essential for holistic care:
- Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for pain: Addresses maladaptive pain beliefs, catastrophising, and avoidance behaviour. Available through publicly funded chronic pain programs and psychology services (MBS Better Access items 80100–80170 for up to 10 sessions per calendar year, with additional sessions available through GP Mental Health Treatment Plan).
- Graded motor imagery and mirror therapy: Particularly effective for CRPS; sequential approach of laterality recognition → mirror therapy → graded exposure.
- Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): Gate control mechanism; self-administered; evidence is mixed but low-risk. Available without prescription; some state-based aids schemes provide funding.
- Exercise therapy and physiotherapy: Graded aerobic exercise improves pain thresholds, mood, and function. Refer via GP Management Plan (MBS 721) and Team Care Arrangement (MBS 723) for up to 5 allied health sessions per year.
- Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR): Growing evidence for chronic pain management; group programs available through some hospital and community health services.
Monitoring
Ongoing monitoring is essential to assess treatment response, manage side effects, and adjust therapy. The following schedule is recommended:
Initial follow-up: Assess tolerability, side effects, and medication adherence. Reinforce slow titration schedule. Check for anticholinergic effects (TCAs), nausea (duloxetine), or dizziness (gabapentinoids). Review suicidal ideation (all antidepressants — TGA black box warning applies).
Titration review: Ensure target therapeutic dose has been reached. Re-administer DN4 or painDETECT to document baseline vs. current score. Assess functional improvement (return to work, sleep quality, mood).
Efficacy assessment: Minimum 6-week trial at therapeutic dose before declaring treatment failure. If ≥ 30% pain reduction and functional improvement → continue. If inadequate → switch or add agent (Step 2 of algorithm). Arrange bloods if indicated (FBC for carbamazepine, EUC for gabapentinoids, LFTs for duloxetine/carbamazepine).
Stabilisation phase: Review 3-monthly. Assess need for combination therapy or specialist referral. Monitor for weight gain (gabapentinoids, TCAs), metabolic effects, and drug interactions. Re-evaluate diagnosis if treatment is ineffective — consider alternative diagnoses (e.g. myelopathy, vascular claudication, fibromyalgia).
Long-term management: Consider dose reduction trial if pain well-controlled for ≥ 6 months. Monitor for opioid use if prescribed (urine drug screening, prescription monitoring via SafeScript/RTPM). Annual review of diagnosis, medication appropriateness, and psychological wellbeing.
Monitoring Investigations
| Investigation | When | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| FBC | Baseline + annually (carbamazepine: regular monitoring per PBS authority) | Carbamazepine: agranulocytosis, aplastic anaemia risk |
| EUC (sodium, renal function) | Baseline + 3-monthly for TCAs, carbamazepine | Hyponatraemia risk (carbamazepine, TCAs, duloxetine) |
| LFTs | Baseline (duloxetine, carbamazepine) | Hepatotoxicity risk |
| ECG | Before starting TCAs (if > 50 years, cardiac history, or dose > 100 mg) | QT prolongation and arrhythmia risk |
| HbA1c / glucose | If diabetic neuropathy suspected | Confirm diabetic aetiology; glycaemic control optimisation |
| B12, folate, TFTs | Baseline in new neuropathic pain presentations | Exclude reversible causes (B12 deficiency, hypothyroidism) |
Special Populations
Pregnancy & Breastfeeding
Paediatrics
Elderly (> 65 years)
Renal Impairment
Hepatic Impairment
Immunocompromised
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians experience a disproportionate burden of conditions causing neuropathic pain. Type 2 diabetes prevalence is 3–4 times higher than in non-Indigenous Australians (AIHW, 2023), driving significantly higher rates of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Herpes zoster incidence is also elevated due to higher rates of immunosuppressive comorbidities. Pain management must be delivered in a culturally safe, trauma-informed manner that acknowledges historical and ongoing barriers to healthcare access.
📚 References
- 1. Finnerup NB, Kuner R, Jensen TS. Neuropathic pain: from mechanisms to treatment. Physiol Rev. 2021;101(1):259-301. doi:10.1152/physrev.00045.2019
- 2. Bouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, et al. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatosensory lesions. Two validation studies of a new diagnostic method (the DN4 questionnaire). Pain. 2005;114(1-2):29-36.
- 3. Freynhagen R, Baron R, Gockel U, Tölle TR. painDETECT: a new screening questionnaire to identify neuropathic components in patients with back pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22(10):1911-1920.
- 4. Finnerup NB, Attal N, Haroutounian S, et al. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(2):162-173.
- 5. Painaustralia. National Strategic Action Plan for Pain Management. Canberra: Painaustralia; 2019.
- 6. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework. Canberra: AIHW; 2023.
- 7. Dworkin RH, O'Connor AB, Audette J, et al. Recommendations for the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain: an overview and literature update. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(3 Suppl):S3-S14.
- 8. Moisset X, Bouhassira D, Avez Couturier J, et al. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for neuropathic pain: systematic review and French recommendations. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2020;176(5):325-352.
- 9. Cruccu G, Di Stefano G, Truini A. Trigeminal neuralgia. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(8):754-762. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1914484
- 10. Harden RN, Bruehl S, Perez RSGM, et al. Validation of proposed diagnostic criteria (the "Budapest Criteria") for complex regional pain syndrome. Pain. 2010;150(2):268-274.
- 11. Mücke M, Phillips T, Radbruch L, Petzke F, Häuser W. Cannabis-based medicines for chronic neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;3(3):CD012182.
- 12. Faculty of Pain Medicine, Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (FPMANZCA). Recommendations regarding the use of opioid analgesics in patients with chronic non-cancer pain. Melbourne: ANZCA; 2022.
- 13. Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). Prescription medicines: new or extended uses, or new combinations of registered medicines. Canberra: Department of Health and Aged Care; 2023.
- 14. CARPA. Central Australian Rural Practitioners Association Standard Treatment Manual. 7th ed. Alice Springs: CARPA; 2017.
- 15. Bates D, Schultheis BC, Hanes MC, et al. A comprehensive algorithm for management of neuropathic pain. Pain Med. 2019;20(Suppl 1):S2-S12.
- 16. Gibson W, Arendt-Nielsen L, Graven-Nielsen T. Reappraisal of the clinical relevance of temporal summation of pain in neuropathic and nociceptive pain conditions. Scand J Pain. 2021;21(2):213-221.