📋 Key Information Summary
- Cancer pain affects 60–70% of patients during treatment and up to 90% with advanced disease; it is multifactorial — arising from the tumour itself, anticancer treatment, or comorbid illness.
- Assess using a validated tool (e.g., Edmonton Symptom Assessment System–revised, Brief Pain Inventory) and document pain character, intensity, mechanism (nociceptive, neuropathic, mixed), functional impact, and psychosocial contributors.
- The WHO analgesic ladder (non-opioids → weak opioids → strong opioids ± adjuvants) remains a useful framework, but modern practice favours individualised multimodal analgesia from the outset.
- First-line strong opioids for moderate-to-severe cancer pain include oral morphine (immediate- and modified-release), oxycodone, and hydromorphone — titrate to effect and prescribe regular laxatives concurrently.
- Fentanyl transdermal patches are appropriate only when opioid requirements are stable; they are NOT suitable for opioid-naïve patients or rapidly escalating pain.
- Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a dose-limiting toxicity of platinum agents, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, bortezomib, and thalidomide; duloxetine is the only agent with level-one evidence for treatment.
- Bone metastases causing pain respond well to radiotherapy (single 8 Gy fraction equally effective), bisphosphonates (zoledronic acid) or denosumab, and corticosteroids for acute flare.
- Breakthrough (incident) pain requires short-onset opioid rescue doses of 10–20% of the total 24-hour opioid dose, given every 30–60 minutes as needed.
- Opioid rotation (switching) may improve efficacy or reduce adverse effects — convert at 50–75% of the equianalgesic dose and re-titrate.
- Adjuvant analgesics — corticosteroids (dexamethasone), gabapentinoids, antidepressants, and nerve blocks — are essential components of a multimodal regimen, especially for neuropathic and bone pain.
- Specialist palliative care referral should be considered early; timely referral improves pain control, quality of life, and survival in advanced cancer.
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians experience higher cancer mortality and later presentation, compounded by barriers to culturally safe pain management and palliative care access in remote communities.
Introduction & Australian Epidemiology
Cancer pain is one of the most feared and prevalent symptoms experienced by people living with cancer. It may arise from direct tumour invasion, anticancer treatments (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy), or concurrent comorbid conditions. Effective pain management is a core component of cancer care and a right of every patient.
In Australia, over 160,000 new cancer diagnoses are made annually (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare [AIHW], 2023). Approximately 60–70% of patients undergoing active treatment report clinically significant pain, rising to 80–90% in advanced or metastatic disease (Currow et al., 2020). Despite guideline-recommended approaches, undertreatment remains common — a 2021 Australian survey found that nearly one-third of patients with cancer-related pain rated their pain as inadequately controlled (Luckett et al., 2021).
Australia's opioid regulatory framework (including real-time prescription monitoring via SafeScript systems) has improved safety but may inadvertently create barriers to timely opioid access for patients with genuine cancer pain. Clinicians must balance responsible prescribing with the imperative to treat suffering.
This article covers the assessment and management of cancer-related pain, treatment-related pain, the rational use of opioids, and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, with emphasis on Australian guidelines, PBS-listed therapies, and equitable access for underserved populations.
Opioids in Cancer Pain
Opioids are the mainstay of moderate-to-severe cancer pain management. They are effective, titratable, and appropriate at all stages of disease when used according to evidence-based principles. Concerns about addiction should not prevent adequate pain treatment in the cancer setting.
Initiation and Titration
Opioid Drug Cards
Opioid Adverse Effects and Management
| Adverse Effect | Incidence | Management |
|---|---|---|
| Constipation | ~100% (no tolerance develops) | Start regular laxative at opioid initiation — senna + docusate (Senokot D®) or macrogol (Movicol®); add naloxegol (Moventig®) if refractory |
| Nausea / vomiting | ~30–40% (tolerance develops in 5–7 days) | Metoclopramide 10 mg TDS or haloperidol 0.5–1 mg nocte; reassess at 1 week |
| Drowsiness / sedation | ~20–30% (tolerance develops in 3–5 days) | Reduce dose, consider opioid rotation, rule out delirium; avoid routine use of psychostimulants |
| Respiratory depression | Rare at titrated doses | Naloxone 0.04–0.4 mg IV/IM/SC; titrate to respiratory improvement (not full reversal to avoid precipitated pain crisis) |
| Pruritus | ~5–15% | Low-dose nalbuphine 2.5 mg IV or antihistamine; consider opioid rotation |
| Myoclonus | ~5–10% (dose-related) | Clonazepam 0.5–1 mg or midazolam 2.5–5 mg SC; reduce dose or rotate opioid |
| Hyperalgesia | Uncommon (dose-related) | Reduce opioid dose, rotate opioid, add ketamine infusion (specialist setting) or methadone |
Opioid Rotation (Switching)
Opioid rotation involves switching from one opioid to another to improve the therapeutic ratio (better analgesia or fewer adverse effects). In cancer pain, opioid rotation is required in approximately 20–30% of patients.
- Calculate the total 24-hour opioid dose of the current opioid.
- Use an equianalgesic dose table (e.g., Palliative Care Australia or eTG) to determine the equivalent dose of the new opioid.
- Reduce the calculated equianalgesic dose by 25–50% to account for incomplete cross-tolerance.
- Initiate the new opioid and titrate to effect over 24–48 hours.
- Provide IR rescue opioid (of the NEW opioid) for breakthrough pain.
- Specialist advice is recommended when rotating to or from methadone due to complex pharmacokinetics.
Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a dose-limiting, often persistent adverse effect affecting 30–70% of patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy. It is a major cause of treatment dose reductions, delays, and discontinuation, and can significantly impair quality of life for months to years after treatment completion.
Causative Agents
| Drug Class | Examples | Pattern of Neuropathy | Typical Onset |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platinum agents | Cisplatin, oxaliplatin, carboplatin (high dose) | Sensory > motor; length-dependent; "stocking-glove"; oxaliplatin: acute cold-triggered paraesthesia (within hours of infusion) | Cumulative; cisplatin typically after 300+ mg/m² total dose |
| Taxanes | Paclitaxel, docetaxel | Sensory predominant; painful paraesthesias in feet/hands; may include myalgia/arthralgia | Often after first cycle; cumulative dose-related |
| Vinca alkaloids | Vincristine | Mixed sensorimotor; autonomic (constipation, ileus); foot/wrist drop | Cumulative; usually after 4+ cycles |
| Proteasome inhibitors | Bortezomib, carfilzomib, ixazomib | Small-fibre predominant; severe burning pain; may be debilitating | Early — often within first 2–4 cycles |
| Immunomodulatory drugs | Thalidomide | Sensory; may be irreversible at high cumulative doses | Cumulative; dose-dependent |
| Epothilones | Ixabepilone | Sensory; similar to taxanes | Cumulative |
Clinical Features and Assessment
- Symmetrical, length-dependent sensory neuropathy: paraesthesias, numbness, burning pain, allodynia, loss of proprioception and vibration sense.
- Motor involvement (less common): distal weakness, foot drop (vincristine), fine motor impairment.
- Autonomic neuropathy: constipation, orthostatic hypotension, urinary retention (vincristine, thalidomide).
- Assessment: Total Neuropathy Score (TNS) or NCI-CTCAE grading; patient-reported outcomes (FACT/GOG-Ntx); nerve conduction studies for diagnostic confirmation.
Treatment of CIPN
Non-Pharmacological Approaches
- Exercise: Supervised aerobic and resistance exercise programmes reduce CIPN severity and improve function (2023 ASCO guideline update).
- Cryotherapy/compression therapy: Cryotherapy gloves/socks during taxane and oxaliplatin infusions may reduce CIPN incidence (emerging evidence from RCTs).
- Scrambler therapy: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation that "scrambles" pain signalling — small studies show benefit in refractory CIPN.
- Physiotherapy and occupational therapy: Balance training, assistive devices for fine motor impairment, and fall prevention strategies.
- Acupuncture: Some evidence for symptom reduction; generally well-tolerated; available through integrative oncology services in Australian cancer centres.
Dose Modification and Prevention
- Grade 2 CIPN (moderate symptoms, limiting instrumental ADLs): consider dose reduction of causative agent (e.g., cisplatin 50% dose reduction; vincristine hold).
- Grade 3–4 CIPN (severe, limiting self-care ADLs, life-threatening): discontinue causative agent and consider alternative regimen if available.
- Prevention: calcium/magnesium infusions were previously used for oxaliplatin CIPN prophylaxis but are no longer recommended after the CONcePT trial showed reduced efficacy of chemotherapy; no other agent has proven efficacy for CIPN prevention (ASCO 2020 guideline).
Multimodal Analgesia & Adjuvant Therapies
Optimal cancer pain management employs a multimodal approach, combining analgesic classes with different mechanisms to achieve synergistic pain relief while minimising opioid-related adverse effects.
Non-Opioid Analgesics
Bone-Targeted Therapies for Bone Metastases
Interventional Pain Management
When systemic analgesia is inadequate or causes intolerable adverse effects, interventional techniques may be considered:
- Nerve blocks: Coeliac plexus block (pancreatic and upper GI cancer pain — reduces opioid requirements by 50–70%); superior hypogastric plexus block (pelvic cancer pain); ganglion impar block (perineal pain).
- Neuraxial analgesia: Intrathecal or epidural morphine via implanted pump for refractory cancer pain; enables lower doses with fewer systemic effects.
- Vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty: For painful vertebral compression fractures due to metastases; rapid pain relief in 70–90% of patients.
- Palliative radiotherapy: Single-fraction (8 Gy) or multi-fraction radiotherapy for painful bone metastases — 60–80% response rate; single fraction is equally effective for uncomplicated bone metastases (TROG 03.04 / Trans-Tasman trial data).
- Radium-223 (Xofigo®): For castration-resistant prostate cancer with symptomatic bone metastases — alpha-emitting radiopharmaceutical; improves overall survival and reduces skeletal events. PBS Authority Required.
Non-Pharmacological Interventions
- Psychological therapies: cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), mindfulness-based stress reduction — all shown to reduce pain intensity and distress in cancer pain.
- Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): adjunct for localised somatic pain; non-invasive and patient-controlled.
- Physiotherapy and exercise: maintains function, reduces pain-related disability; particularly important for bone metastases — supervised exercise with fracture-risk assessment.
- Complementary therapies: massage, relaxation therapy, music therapy — available through Australian cancer support services; evidence for moderate benefit in symptom relief.
Monitoring & Follow-Up
- Reassess pain intensity, functional status, and adverse effects at every consultation (minimum weekly during active titration, then every 2–4 weeks when stable).
- Use standardised pain assessment tools (ESAS-r, BPI) for serial monitoring — enables objective tracking of treatment response.
- Monitor for opioid adverse effects systematically: constipation (ask at every visit), sedation, cognitive effects, nausea, and pruritus.
- Reassess renal function (eGFR) regularly when using morphine, gabapentinoids, or NSAIDs — at least monthly in advanced cancer with declining function.
- Monitor for opioid misuse or aberrant behaviour using clinical observation; routine urine drug screening is not standard in cancer pain management but may be considered in complex cases.
- Patients on long-term opioids: annual review of ongoing need, efficacy, dose stability, and quality of life; consider trial of dose reduction if pain aetiology has changed.
- For CIPN: serial assessment using FACT/GOG-Ntx or NCI-CTCAE grading; reassess need for ongoing chemotherapy modification.
- Patients on bisphosphonates/denosumab: monitor serum calcium, phosphate, renal function (creatinine) before each infusion; dental review every 6 months.
- Psychosocial screen: depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), and spiritual distress at diagnosis and periodically throughout treatment — refer to psycho-oncology or counselling if identified.
Special Populations
Pregnancy & Breastfeeding
Paediatrics
Elderly
Renal Impairment
Hepatic Impairment
Immunocompromised
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians experience a 1.4-fold higher overall cancer incidence and 1.5-fold higher cancer mortality compared with non-Indigenous Australians (AIHW, 2023). Presentation at more advanced stages is more common, contributing to higher symptom burden including pain. Culturally safe, equitable access to cancer pain management and palliative care is a national priority.
📚 References
- 1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Cancer in Australia 2023. AIHW, Canberra; 2023.
- 2. Currow DC, Phillips J, Clark K. Using opioids in general practice for chronic non-cancer pain: an overview of current evidence. Med J Aust. 2016;204(8):305–309.
- 3. Luckett T, Phillips J, Agar M, et al. Elements of effective palliative care models: a rapid review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):1–15.
- 4. Swarm RA, Paice JA, Anghelescu DL, et al. Adult cancer pain, version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17(8):977–1007.
- 5. Fallon M, Giusti R, Aielli F, et al. Management of cancer pain in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(Suppl 4):iv166–iv191.
- 6. Hershman DL, Lacchetti C, Dworkin RH, et al. Prevention and management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in survivors of adult cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(18):1941–1967.
- 7. Loprinzi CL, Lacchetti C, Bleeker J, et al. Prevention and management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in survivors of adult cancers: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(28):3325–3348.
- 8. Smith EM, Pang H, Cirrincione C, et al. Effect of duloxetine on pain, function, and quality of life among patients with chemotherapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;309(13):1359–1367.
- 9. Chow E, Zeng L, Salvo N, et al. Update on the systematic review of palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012;24(2):112–124.
- 10. Portenoy RK, Ahmed E. Cancer pain syndromes: clinical features and diagnosis. In: UpToDate. Wolters Kluwer; 2024.
- 11. RACGP. Prescribing drugs of dependence in general practice: Part C2 — The role of opioids in pain management. 3rd edn. Melbourne: RACGP; 2023.
- 12. Palliative Care Australia. National Palliative Care Strategy 2018. Canberra: Department of Health; 2018.
- 13. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cancer Framework. Cancer Council Australia / Menzies School of Health Research; 2020.
- 14. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. 2nd edn. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2021.
- 15. Mercadante S, Portenoy RK. Opioid poorly-responsive cancer pain. Part 1: Clinical considerations. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001;21(2):144–150.