📋 Key Information Summary
- Heart failure (HF) trajectory is characterised by unpredictable decline interspersed with acute decompensations; early integration of palliative care improves symptom burden and quality of life without shortening survival.
- NYHA Class III–IV patients experience dyspnoea, fatigue, oedema, and cachexia that significantly impair daily function; palliative care referral should be considered at NYHA III and is strongly recommended at NYHA IV.
- Diuretics remain the cornerstone of fluid overload management in advanced HF; IV frusemide (Lasix®) 40–80 mg is first-line for acute congestion, with metolazone (Zaroxolyn®) as a potent oral adjunct for diuretic resistance.
- Loop diuretic dosing in palliative care is symptom-directed rather than weight-driven; the goal is comfort, not euvolaemia, and must be individualised to patient preferences.
- ICD (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator) deactivation should be discussed with all patients approaching end of life; repeated appropriate or inappropriate shocks cause significant distress and rarely improve quality of life.
- CRT (cardiac resynchronisation therapy) can be continued or deactivated based on symptom benefit; a functioning CRT-P or CRT-D may reduce dyspnoea and should not be reflexively deactivated.
- Low-dose opioids (oral morphine 2.5–5 mg PRN) are first-line for refractory breathlessness in advanced HF; start low, titrate slowly, and prescribe with aperients.
- Chest pain in end-stage HF is managed with sublingual GTN, low-dose opioids, and benzodiazepines for anxiety-related chest tightness; exclude acute coronary syndrome if the patient's goals include active treatment.
- Advance care planning (ACP) discussions should be initiated early and revisited at every stage transition; use Respecting Patient Choices® or equivalent state-based frameworks.
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians experience HF at higher rates with younger onset; culturally safe palliative care requires community engagement, family-centred decision-making, and access to Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations (ACCHOs).
- Withdrawal of disease-modifying HF medications (ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) is appropriate when treatment burden outweighs benefit; deprescribing should be gradual and guided by symptoms.
- Renal function often deteriorates in advanced HF (cardiorenal syndrome); diuretic doses and electrolyte monitoring must be adjusted accordingly, and nephrology co-management may be needed for ultrafiltration decisions.
Introduction & Australian Epidemiology
Heart failure is a progressive clinical syndrome affecting approximately 500,000 Australians, with prevalence increasing sharply with age. The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) reports that heart failure is responsible for over 65,000 hospitalisations annually, and it remains the leading cause of preventable hospitalisation in people aged 65 and older. Despite advances in disease-modifying therapies — including angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and device therapy — the trajectory of advanced heart failure is characterised by recurrent decompensations, progressive functional decline, and high symptom burden.
Palliative care integration in heart failure has historically been delayed compared with oncology, largely because the HF disease trajectory is unpredictable, with acute decompensations followed by partial recovery (the "rollercoaster" pattern). International and Australian data show that fewer than 20% of HF patients receive specialist palliative care, and many are referred only in the last weeks of life. The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) and the National Heart Foundation of Australia recommend early palliative care as an adjunct to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), not as an alternative.
This topic integrates palliative care with optimised cardiac management across four key domains: symptom classification and management (NYHA III/IV), diuretic and fluid overload strategies, device decision-making, and the management of chest pain and breathlessness. The overarching goal is to improve quality of life, reduce unnecessary hospitalisations, and support patients and families through the continuum of advanced heart failure.
| Metric | Australia (approximate) |
|---|---|
| Estimated HF prevalence | ~500,000 (2.0% adult population) |
| Annual HF hospitalisations | >65,000 (AIHW 2022–23) |
| 5-year mortality (all-comers) | ~50–75% |
| NYHA III–IV at diagnosis | ~30–40% |
| Receiving specialist palliative care | <20% |
| ATSI HF burden (age-standardised) | 1.6–2.4× higher than non-Indigenous Australians |
NYHA III/IV Symptoms
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification remains the most widely used framework for grading symptom severity in heart failure and guides treatment decisions, prognosis, and the timing of palliative care referral.
Symptom Burden in Advanced HF
Patients with NYHA III–IV heart failure experience a symptom burden comparable to or exceeding that of advanced cancer. The most prevalent symptoms include:
- Dyspnoea — present in 80–95% of NYHA IV patients; worsens with supine position (orthopnoea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea); the single most distressing symptom reported.
- Fatigue and weakness — affects 70–90%; driven by low cardiac output, skeletal muscle myopathy, deconditioning, and comorbidities.
- Peripheral oedema — often refractory to diuretics in advanced disease; can cause skin breakdown, reduced mobility, and distress.
- Cachexia and muscle wasting — cardiac cachexia (unintentional loss >5% body weight over 12 months in non-oedematous patients) indicates poor prognosis (median survival <12 months).
- Depression and anxiety — prevalence 20–40%; underdiagnosed and undertreated; associated with worse HF outcomes and increased hospitalisation.
- Pain — reported by 40–70%; may be cardiac (ischaemic), musculoskeletal, hepatic congestion, or related to comorbidities.
- Cognitive impairment — "HF brain" affects up to 50% of patients; driven by cerebral hypoperfusion, cerebral microemboli, and neurohormonal activation; impairs capacity for ACP discussions.
- Poor appetite and nausea — hepatic and gut congestion, medications, and depression all contribute.
Triggers for Palliative Care Referral
Consider specialist palliative care referral when any of the following apply:
- NYHA Class IV or persistent NYHA III despite optimal GDMT
- ≥2 hospitalisations for acute decompensation in the preceding 12 months
- Cardiac cachexia or progressive unintentional weight loss
- Patient or family-expressed desire for comfort-focused care
- Consideration of LVAD or transplant listing (for goals-of-care discussion, not necessarily contraindication)
- Device-related decision-making (ICD deactivation, CRT continuation)
- Refractory symptoms despite maximal pharmacotherapy
Diuretics & Fluid Overload
Diuretics are the most effective symptomatic therapy for congestion in heart failure and remain a cornerstone of palliative cardiac management. In the palliative context, the goal shifts from achieving a target weight or euvolaemia to optimising patient comfort. Fluid overload management must be individualised, balancing symptom relief against the risks of renal impairment, electrolyte disturbance, and excessive dehydration.
Loop Diuretics
Thiazide-Type Diuretics (Diuretic Resistance)
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRAs)
Diuretic Resistance: Practical Approach
Electrolyte Monitoring
| Parameter | Frequency | Action Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Potassium (K⁺) | Within 3–7 days of dose change; then every 2–4 weeks if stable | <3.5 or >5.5 mmol/L: adjust diuretic/MRA, supplement if needed |
| Sodium (Na⁺) | Same as potassium | <130 mmol/L: dilutional hyponatraemia — fluid restriction, review diuretics |
| Creatinine / eGFR | Same as potassium | eGFR decline >20%: consider reducing diuretic dose; if symptomatic, accept modest renal impairment (permissive renal dysfunction) |
| Magnesium (Mg²⁺) | Every 2–4 weeks | <0.7 mmol/L: supplement with oral magnesium orotate (Mg-Organon®) |
| Uric acid | As clinically indicated | Gout flares common with diuretics; manage per standard protocols |
Device Decisions
Patients with advanced heart failure frequently have implantable cardiac devices, including ICDs (implantable cardioverter-defibrillators), CRT (cardiac resynchronisation therapy) devices, and permanent pacemakers. Device-related decisions are among the most complex and emotionally charged aspects of palliative care in cardiology. These discussions require sensitivity, multidisciplinary input, and clear documentation.
Types of Devices and Palliative Considerations
| Device | Function | Palliative Consideration |
|---|---|---|
| ICD (single- or dual-chamber) | Delivers defibrillation shocks for ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation | Deactivation recommended when goals shift to comfort; shocks at end of life are painful and distressing; do not prevent death from non-arrhythmic causes (pump failure) |
| CRT-D | CRT with defibrillation capability | CRT pacing component may improve symptoms; consider deactivating shock function while maintaining CRT pacing if symptomatic benefit persists |
| CRT-P | CRT pacing only (no defibrillator) | May improve dyspnoea and functional capacity; continue if providing symptom benefit; no harm in keeping active at end of life |
| Permanent pacemaker (PPM) | Bradycardia pacing | Pacemaker-dependent patients: withdrawal will result in symptomatic bradycardia and death; discuss with patient/family; rarely deactivated |
| LVAD (left ventricular assist device) | Mechanical circulatory support | Destination therapy (not bridged to transplant): complex deactivation discussions required; deactivation is legal and ethical with informed consent; specialist palliative care essential |
ICD Deactivation: Practical Guide
When to Discuss Device Decisions
- At the time of device implantation (pre-implantation counselling should include end-of-life scenarios)
- At every NYHA class transition (especially II → III and III → IV)
- After ≥2 hospitalisations for decompensation in 12 months
- When considering device replacement (generator change) — battery replacement is an opportunity to revisit goals
- When initiating palliative care or advance care planning
- When the patient or family raises quality-of-life concerns
LVAD Deactivation
Left ventricular assist device deactivation is a particularly complex scenario. Patients on destination LVAD therapy (not listed for transplant) have a median survival of 2–4 years with the device. When the patient's goals shift to comfort, deactivation can be discussed. Key points:
- LVAD deactivation results in death within minutes to hours in the absence of residual cardiac function
- The patient and family must be counselled on expected timeline and symptom management
- Opioid and benzodiazepine pre-loading should be provided before deactivation
- Procedure should occur in a supportive setting (hospice, home with palliative care team, or ICU/CCU with palliative input)
- Device specialist (VAD coordinator) must be involved in planning
- Legal and ethical frameworks in all Australian states and territories support deactivation with patient consent
Chest Pain & Breathlessness
Chest pain and breathlessness are the two most distressing symptoms in advanced heart failure and the primary drivers of emergency department presentation and hospitalisation. Effective palliative management requires a systematic approach that distinguishes ischaemic pain from non-cardiac causes, addresses the multiple drivers of dyspnoea, and employs both pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies.
Breathlessness Management
Dyspnoea in advanced HF is multifactorial — pulmonary congestion, reduced cardiac output, respiratory muscle weakness, deconditioning, anaemia, anxiety, and pleural effusions all contribute. Management should address each reversible cause while employing comfort measures.
Pharmacological Management of Refractory Dyspnoea
Anxiolytics for Dyspnoea-Related Anxiety
Non-Pharmacological Strategies for Breathlessness
- Positioning: Upright or semi-reclined (45°); sitting in a chair with forearms supported on a table is often more comfortable than propped up in bed.
- Fan therapy: A handheld fan directed at the face activates trigeminal nerve receptors and reduces the sensation of dyspnoea. Evidence-supported, zero-cost, and patient-controlled.
- Pursed-lip breathing: Reduces respiratory rate, increases tidal volume, and decreases air trapping; taught by physiotherapy.
- Breathing exercises and relaxation: Guided by palliative care physiotherapy or occupational therapy.
- Energy conservation and pacing: Occupational therapy assessment for activities of daily living; prioritisation of meaningful activities.
- Pleural drainage: Therapeutic thoracocentesis for large pleural effusions causing dyspnoea; consider indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) for recurrent effusions in patients with reasonable prognosis.
Chest Pain Management
Chest pain in advanced HF may be ischaemic (supply–demand mismatch or acute coronary syndrome), non-cardiac (musculoskeletal, oesophageal, anxiety), or related to right heart congestion (hepatic capsule distension). A systematic approach is essential.
| Cause | Clinical Features | Management |
|---|---|---|
| Ischaemic (chronic angina) | Substernal, exertion-related, relieved by rest or GTN | Sublingual GTN PRN; long-acting nitrates (ISMO® 20 mg PO BD); if not on beta-blocker, consider low-dose metoprolol 23.75–47.5 mg PO daily |
| Acute coronary syndrome | New-onset or changing pattern; may be atypical in elderly/DM | If goals include active management: standard ACS pathway; if comfort-focused: GTN + morphine + benzodiazepine |
| Hepatic congestion | RUQ discomfort, hepatomegaly, elevated JVP | Diuretic optimisation; simple analgesia (paracetamol 1 g QID) |
| Musculoskeletal | Positional, reproducible on palpation, rib cage/chest wall | Paracetamol; topical NSAIDs; avoid systemic NSAIDs (fluid retention, worsen HF) |
| Anxiety-related | Tight band-like sensation, associated with hyperventilation, no exertional pattern | Benzodiazepines (diazepam 2 mg or lorazepam 0.5 mg PRN); psychological support; mindfulness-based interventions |
Last-Days Symptom Management
In the final days of life, symptom management priorities shift to maximising comfort. A syringe driver (McKinley T34 or equivalent) may be used for continuous subcutaneous infusion when oral medications are no longer tolerated.
Pathophysiology of Advanced Heart Failure
Understanding the pathophysiology of advanced heart failure is essential for effective palliative management. The terminal phase of HF is characterised by a self-perpetuating cycle of neurohormonal activation, myocardial remodelling, and end-organ dysfunction that ultimately becomes refractory to pharmacological intervention.
- Neurohormonal activation: Persistent activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) and sympathetic nervous system drives vasoconstriction, sodium and water retention, myocardial fibrosis, and progressive ventricular remodelling. Despite maximal GDMT (ACE-I/ARB/ARNI, beta-blocker, MRA, SGLT2i), residual neurohormonal activation persists in advanced disease.
- Cardiorenal syndrome: Reduced cardiac output triggers renal vasoconstriction and sodium retention; renal dysfunction impairs diuretic responsiveness and causes fluid overload. This bidirectional relationship accelerates decline.
- Venous congestion: Elevated filling pressures cause hepatic congestion (leading to cardiac cirrhosis in chronic cases), gut oedema (malabsorption, bacterial translocation), and pulmonary congestion (alveolar oedema, pleural effusions).
- Cardiac cachexia: Driven by chronic inflammation (elevated TNF-α, IL-6), neurohormonal activation, anorexia, gut malabsorption, and increased metabolic demand. Loss of lean muscle mass >5% over 12 months (non-oedematous) defines cardiac cachexia and carries a median survival of <12 months.
- Arrhythmia substrate: Myocardial fibrosis creates a substrate for ventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation; sudden cardiac death accounts for 25–50% of HF deaths, though this proportion decreases with advancing disease (pump failure predominates).
Investigations
Investigations in advanced HF should be guided by the patient's goals of care. In the palliative context, the question is: "Will this test change management in a way that aligns with the patient's goals?" Routine monitoring of fluid status, renal function, and electrolytes remains important for diuretic management, but invasive or burdensome investigations should be avoided if they will not alter the care plan.
Risk Stratification & Prognostication
Prognostication in heart failure is notoriously difficult compared with cancer, where median survivals are more predictable. The "surprise question" — "Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?" — remains a useful screening tool for initiating palliative care discussions. Several validated risk scores can supplement clinical judgement.
| Risk Score | Components | Utility in Palliative Setting |
|---|---|---|
| Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) | Age, sex, NYHA, LVEF, BP, medications, devices, labs (Na⁺, cholesterol, uric acid, haemoglobin, lymphocyte %, BNP) | Estimates 1–3 year survival; web-based calculator; useful for framing prognosis discussions. Website: depts.washington.edu/shfm |
| MAGGIC Score | Age, sex, NYHA, LVEF, BMI, BP, diabetes, COPD, medications, creatinine, Na⁺, smoking | Meta-analysis-derived; estimates 1–3 year mortality; available as web calculator |
| ESCAPE Risk Score | BUN, BP, orthopnoea duration, 6-min walk, BNP, sodium | Inpatient 6-month mortality prediction; useful during hospital admissions for decompensation |
| "Surprise question" | Clinician intuition | Sensitivity ~80% for 12-month mortality when answer is "No, I would not be surprised"; triggers palliative care referral consideration |
Poor Prognostic Indicators in Advanced HF
- NYHA Class IV despite optimal GDMT
- LVEF <20%
- Cardiac cachexia (unintentional weight loss >5% in 12 months)
- Recurrent hospitalisations (≥3 in 12 months)
- Persistent hyponatraemia (Na⁺ <130 mmol/L)
- Renal dysfunction refractory to diuretic adjustment (cardiorenal syndrome type 2)
- NT-proBNP >5000 pg/mL despite treatment
- Inotrope dependence (requirement for continuous IV inotropes: dobutamine, milrinone)
- Declining functional status (6-minute walk <300 metres or bed-bound)
- Implantable device reaching battery end-of-life with patient not wanting replacement
Monitoring
Monitoring in palliative HF care should be proportionate to the patient's goals. The frequency and intensity of monitoring should decrease as goals shift from disease-modifying to purely comfort-focused.
| Phase | Monitoring | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Stable palliative (NYHA III) | Weight, BP, HR, SpO₂, U&E, BNP, symptom assessment (ESAS-r/KCCQ), fluid balance | Clinic every 2–4 weeks; bloods every 4–6 weeks |
| Unstable/declining (NYHA IV) | As above + daily weight at home, weekly U&E, echocardiography if clinical change | Clinic or phone weekly; bloods weekly during diuretic changes |
| End of life (last weeks) | Symptom assessment only; U&E only if informing diuretic dose; no routine BNP | Daily contact (palliative care team, GP, or community nurse) |
| Active dying (last days) | Comfort observations only; respiratory rate, consciousness level, symptom distress | Continuous or 4-hourly observations by nursing staff or carers |
Self-Management and Telemonitoring
Remote monitoring programmes (e.g., telemonitoring of daily weight, blood pressure, and symptoms) have shown mixed results in randomised trials but may be useful for selected patients who wish to remain at home. Australian models include the Heart Foundation's MyHeart MyLife programme and state-based HF nurse-led telemonitoring services. These should be offered as adjuncts to, not replacements for, regular clinical review.
Deprescribing in Advanced HF
As heart failure progresses and goals of care shift, many disease-modifying medications become burdensome without proportional benefit. Deprescribing should be systematic, gradual, and guided by patient preferences.
Medications to Consider Stopping
| Medication | Rationale for Cessation | How to Stop |
|---|---|---|
| Statins | No acute benefit; primary prevention role becomes irrelevant when prognosis is <12 months; reduces pill burden | Cease abruptly (no tapering needed) |
| Warfarin / DOACs (non-AF indication) | If prescribed for HF itself (no AF or VTE), evidence is limited; bleeding risk increases; reduce monitoring burden | Cease; no tapering for DOACs; for warfarin, INR will normalise over 2–5 days |
| Beta-blockers | May cause fatigue and hypotension in advanced HF; if causing symptomatic bradycardia or limiting diuretic efficacy | Taper gradually over 1–2 weeks (risk of rebound tachycardia and decompensation) |
| ACE inhibitors / ARBs / ARNI | May cause hypotension, renal impairment, cough; if symptomatic hypotension (SBP <90), consider dose reduction or cessation | Taper gradually over 1–2 weeks; monitor for rebound fluid retention |
| SGLT2 inhibitors (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin) | Low pill burden, few symptoms, but genital infections and volume depletion may occur; generally well tolerated even in advanced HF; may continue until last days | Cease when oral intake ceases or at comfort-care transition |
| Antiplatelet agents (aspirin, clopidogrel) | Bleeding risk; if no recent ACS/stent, primary prevention benefit is negligible at end of life | Cease abruptly |
Special Populations
Pregnancy
Paediatrics
Elderly (≥75 years)
Renal Impairment
Hepatic Impairment
Immunocompromised
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health
📚 References
- 1. National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand. Australian Clinical Guidelines for Heart Failure 2024. Sydney: NHF; 2024.
- 2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Heart, stroke and vascular disease — Australian facts 2024. AIHW Cat. No. CDK 011. Canberra: AIHW; 2024.
- 3. Jaarsma T, Beattie JM, Ryder M, et al. Palliative care in heart failure: a position statement from the palliative care workshop of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009;11(5):433–443.
- 4. >Fromm RE, Nauman JA, Maier D, et al. Cardiac disease in the palliative care setting. In: Hanks G, Cherny NI, Christakis NA, et al., editors. Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015:927–942.
- 5. Sobanski PZ, Alt-Epping B, Currow DC, et al. Palliative care for people living with heart failure: European Association for Palliative Care Task Force expert statement. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22(7):1136–1150.
- 6. Palliative Care Australia. National Palliative Care Standards. 5th ed. Canberra: PCA; 2018.
- 7. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National Consensus Statement: Essential elements for safe and high-quality end-of-life care. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2015.
- 8. Raphael CE, O'Garr G, Scott IA, et al. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator deactivation in advanced heart failure: a systematic review. Heart Lung Circ. 2022;31(4):493–502.
- 9. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee. Circulation. 2022;145(18):e895–e1032.
- 10. Rankin J, Hossain M, Johnson M. Diuretics for palliative care patients with fluid overload. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;4:CD014635.
- 11. Ekström M, Bajwah S, Bland JM, Currow DC, Hussain J, Johnson MJ. One evidence base; three stories: do opioids relieve chronic breathlessness? Thorax. 2018;73(1):98–100.
- 12. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework. AIHW analysis of National Mortality Database. Canberra: AIHW; 2023.
- 13. RHDAustralia (ARF/RHD Register and Endocarditis). 2020 Australian guideline for prevention, diagnosis and management of acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. 3rd ed. Darwin: Menzies School of Health Research; 2020.
- 14. Allen LA, Stevenson LW, Grady KL, et al. Decision making in advanced heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125(15):1928–1952.