📋 Key Information Summary
- Palliative care should be integrated early in the trajectory of advanced multimorbidity, frailty and dementia — not reserved for the last days of life.
- Goals-of-care conversations should be initiated when prognosis is uncertain, function is declining or the person expresses preferences, and documented using a nationally recognised form (e.g. Goals of Patient Care, Resuscitation Plan).
- Advance care planning (ACP) is a legally supported process in every Australian state and territory; completed documents should be uploaded to My Health Record and communicated across care settings.
- Capacity is decision-specific and time-specific; a diagnosis of dementia does not automatically equate to incapacity — a structured assessment (e.g. MacCAT-T) is required.
- Symptom control in palliative care follows the WHO analgesic ladder; opioids remain the mainstay for moderate-to-severe pain with renal and hepatic dose adjustments essential in the elderly.
- Subcutaneous midazolam (0.25–0.5 mg SC) is first-line for terminal agitation; haloperidol (0.5–1 mg SC) for nausea/vomiting when oral route is lost.
- Australian state and territory guardianship legislation appoints substitute decision-makers in a defined hierarchy (e.g. spouse → adult child → parent → sibling); clinicians must know the local hierarchy.
- Safeguarding obligations require clinicians to recognise and report elder abuse under mandatory reporting provisions and state-specific Adult Safeguarding Acts.
- Medication review and deprescribing are core competencies in palliative geriatrics — cease non-essential preventive medications when goals shift to comfort.
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples face unique barriers including distrust of institutional care, geographic isolation and the need for culturally safe, family-centred palliative models.
- The Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC) and Australian Atlas of Healthcare Variation highlight significant inequities in palliative care access, particularly in rural and remote areas.
- Clinicians should proactively discuss resuscitation status, artificial nutrition, hospital transfer and preferred place of death as part of structured goals-of-care documentation.
Introduction & Australian Epidemiology
Palliative geriatric care integrates prognosis estimation, patient values elicitation, capacity assessment, family communication and structured end-of-life planning. It applies to all older Australians living with advanced chronic illness, frailty or dementia — not only those with a cancer diagnosis. The goal is to maximise quality of life, manage distressing symptoms and ensure that medical interventions align with what matters most to the individual.
In Australia, people aged ≥65 years account for approximately 70% of all deaths each year, yet access to specialist palliative care services remains inequitable. The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) reports that while around 74,000 Australians received specialist palliative care in 2021–22, many older adults — particularly those in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) and rural/remote settings — receive suboptimal end-of-life care.
Dementia is the second leading cause of death in Australia and the leading cause in women. People with dementia often have prolonged dying trajectories with complex symptom burden, yet they are less likely to receive palliative care referrals compared with cancer patients. The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) National Consensus Statement: Essential Elements for Safe and High-Quality End-of-Life Care provides a framework for all health service organisations.
Key Australian organisations and frameworks relevant to this topic include:
- Palliative Care Australia (PCA) — National Palliative Care Standards (2018)
- ACSQHC — National Consensus Statement for End-of-Life Care
- Advance Care Planning Australia (ACPA) — national ACP framework
- Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC) — national benchmarking
- Australian Guardianship and Administration Acts (state/territory-specific)
- Aged Care Quality Standards — Standard 2 (Ongoing Assessment and Planning), Standard 3 (Personal Care and Clinical Care)
Symptom Control and Comfort Care
Effective symptom management is the foundation of palliative geriatric care. Older adults frequently present with multiple concurrent symptoms including pain, dyspnoea, nausea, delirium, agitation, constipation and anorexia. Pharmacotherapy must be adjusted for age-related changes in renal clearance, hepatic metabolism, body composition and polypharmacy risk.
Pain Management
Pain in older adults is commonly under-recognised due to cognitive impairment, stoicism and atypical presentations. Assessment should use validated tools (e.g. Abbey Pain Scale for non-verbal patients, Numeric Rating Scale for verbal patients).
Dyspnoea
Breathlessness in advanced illness is often multifactorial (cardiac failure, COPD, pleural effusion, deconditioning, anxiety). Non-pharmacological interventions are first-line: fan therapy, positioning, relaxation techniques and pacing. Pharmacologically, low-dose opioids are evidence-based for refractory breathlessness.
For dyspnoea: morphine 2.5–5 mg PO or 1–2.5 mg SC every 4 hours; nebulised saline for secretion comfort. Avoid routine oxygen in non-hypoxic breathlessness — a fan directed to the face is equally effective.
Nausea and Vomiting
Choose anti-emetic based on the underlying mechanism:
| Mechanism | First-line Agent | Dose (elderly) |
|---|---|---|
| Chemoreceptor trigger zone (opioid-induced, metabolic) | Haloperidol | 0.5–1 mg PO/SC OD–BD |
| Gastric stasis / gastroparesis | Metoclopramide | 5–10 mg PO/SC TDS (before meals); caution in extrapyramidal side-effects |
| Vestibular / motion-related | Cyclizine | 25–50 mg PO/SC TDS; anticholinergic — avoid in delirium |
| Raised intracranial pressure / bowel obstruction | Dexamethasone | 4–8 mg PO/IV OD (morning) |
| Serotonin-mediated (chemotherapy) | Ondansetron | 4–8 mg PO/IV OD–BD; watch for constipation |
Terminal Agitation and Delirium
Terminal agitation (also called terminal restlessness) occurs in up to 42% of patients in the last days of life. It is characterised by restlessness, moaning, grimacing, myoclonus and altered consciousness. Reversible causes should be excluded where clinically appropriate (urinary retention, faecal impaction, medication effects including opioids).
Constipation
Opioid-induced constipation is predictable and must be prevented, not treated reactively. All patients commenced on opioids should receive a co-prescribed aperient:
- First-line: docusate sodium 100 mg + senna 8–12 mg PO at night
- Second-line: macrogol 3350 (1–2 sachets PO daily); lactulose 15–30 mL BD if needed
- Refractory: subcutaneous methylnaltrexone (Relistor®) 8 mg SC every other day — specifically for opioid-induced constipation unresponsive to standard aperients
Secretion Management (Death Rattle)
Noisy upper airway secretions in the dying patient are distressing for families. Non-pharmacological measures (repositioning, gentle suctioning if accessible) are first-line. If persistent, glycopyrrolate 200 µg SC or hyoscine butylbromide 20 mg SC every 4–6 hours may reduce secretion volume. Explain to families that the patient is unlikely to be distressed by the sound.
Deprescribing in Palliative Care
As goals shift from disease modification to comfort, clinicians should systematically review and deprescribe medications that no longer align with goals of care. Examples include statins, antihypertensives (if hypotensive), anticoagulants (when risk of bleeding exceeds benefit), oral hypoglycaemics and bisphosphonates. The STOPPFrail criteria provide a structured framework for deprescribing in frail older adults with limited life expectancy.
Advance Care Planning and Goals of Care
Advance care planning (ACP) is a process of discussion and documentation that enables a person to express their values, preferences and wishes for future health care. In Australia, ACP is supported by all state and territory governments and endorsed by Advance Care Planning Australia (ACPA), a national program funded by the Australian Government.
When to Initiate ACP
ACP conversations should be initiated proactively, ideally in the community or early in an admission, rather than during a crisis. Trigger points include:
- Diagnosis of advanced or life-limiting illness (e.g. heart failure NYHA III–IV, COPD GOLD stage IV, advanced dementia, metastatic cancer)
- Increasing frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale ≥5) with recurrent hospitalisations
- Transition to residential aged care
- Patient or family-initiated request
- Before a major surgical or interventional procedure
- During comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)
Key Components of ACP
Australian ACP Documentation
| Document | Purpose | Legal Status |
|---|---|---|
| Advance Care Directive (ACD) | Legally binding document stating the person's instructions for future treatment; may include refusals of treatment | Legally binding under state/territory legislation (e.g. Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act 2016 Vic; Advance Health Directive Act 1997 Qld) |
| Goals of Patient Care (GoPC) / Resuscitation Plan (RP) | Clinical document specifying treatment goals, ceiling of care and resuscitation orders in the current clinical context | Not a substitute for ACD but guides clinical decision-making; part of the medical record |
| Substitute Decision-Maker Appointment | Formal appointment of a person to make decisions on behalf of the individual if they lose capacity | Varies by jurisdiction — e.g. Power of Attorney (Medical Treatment) Vic; Enduring Power of Guardianship WA |
Preferred Place of Care and Death
Australian data (PCOC, AIHW) consistently shows that the majority of older Australians prefer to die at home or in their RACF rather than in hospital. However, approximately 50% of deaths in those aged ≥65 still occur in acute hospitals. Structured ACP, combined with adequate community palliative care resources, can help align care with patient preferences.
Capacity and Consent
Capacity assessment is a core competency for clinicians caring for older adults. Capacity is a legal and clinical concept — it is decision-specific, time-specific and task-specific. A person may have capacity to make some decisions (e.g. daily routines) but not others (e.g. complex medical treatment). A diagnosis of dementia, intellectual disability or mental illness does not automatically equate to incapacity.
Legal Framework in Australia
Capacity legislation varies by state and territory but shares common principles. The relevant statutes include:
- Victoria: Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act 2016; Guardianship and Administration Act 2019
- New South Wales: Guardianship Act 1987; Health Care Consent Act (common law)
- Queensland: Guardianship and Administration Act 2000; Powers of Attorney Act 1998
- Western Australia: Guardianship and Administration Act 1990
- South Australia: Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995; Advance Care Directives Act 2013
- Tasmania: Guardianship and Administration Act 1995
- ACT: Guardianship and Management of Property Act 1991
- Northern Territory: Advance Personal Planning Act 2013
Assessing Capacity
Capacity assessment requires the person to demonstrate all four of the following abilities:
Structured Capacity Assessment Tools
| Tool | Description | Setting |
|---|---|---|
| MacCAT-T (MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment) | Gold standard semi-structured interview assessing understand, appreciate, reason and express a choice for a specific treatment decision | Specialist assessment — geriatrics, psychiatry |
| ACE (Aid to Capacity Evaluation) | 8-item clinician-administered tool covering understanding, appreciation, reasoning and expression of choice; practical and quick | ED, general medicine, geriatrics |
| MMSE / MoCA | Cognitive screening tools — do NOT equate to capacity but help identify cognitive domains that may affect decision-making. MMSE <20 or MoCA <18 raises concern but does not determine incapacity. | Any clinical setting |
| Functional Assessment of Capacity (clinical) | Informal bedside assessment: explain the decision in plain language, ask the patient to repeat it back, ask what they think will happen if they accept/refuse, and observe their reasoning | All clinical settings — first-line approach |
Maximising Capacity
Before concluding that a person lacks capacity, clinicians must take practicable steps to maximise their ability to participate:
- Treat delirium — correct reversible causes (infection, medications, metabolic derangement)
- Optimise sensory environment — hearing aids, glasses, quiet room, adequate lighting
- Choose the best time of day (avoid sundowning periods in dementia)
- Use plain language, short sentences, visual aids and interpreter services
- Involve trusted family members or carers to assist with communication
- Allow adequate time — do not rush the conversation
- Reassess after an interval — capacity may fluctuate, especially in delirium
Consent in Emergency and Implied Consent
In emergency situations where a patient lacks capacity and no substitute decision-maker is available, clinicians may provide treatment that is reasonably necessary and in the patient's best interests (common law doctrine of necessity). This extends to providing comfort care and symptom management. Life-sustaining treatment should not be withdrawn without appropriate authority.
Ethics, Safeguarding and Substitute Decision-Making
Ethical Principles in Palliative Geriatric Care
Clinical decision-making in palliative geriatrics is guided by four foundational ethical principles, applied in the context of Australian law and professional standards:
| Principle | Application in Geriatric Palliative Care |
|---|---|
| Autonomy | Respect the person's right to make informed decisions, including refusal of treatment. Honour advance care directives. Support decision-making through ACP, even when capacity is impaired. |
| Beneficence | Act in the patient's best interest — provide effective symptom management, prevent suffering and support quality of life. |
| Non-maleficence | Avoid futile or harmful interventions. Withhold or withdraw treatments that cause disproportionate burden without benefit (e.g. repeated hospital transfers for a person with end-stage dementia who is comfort-focused). |
| Justice | Ensure equitable access to palliative care regardless of diagnosis, geography, socioeconomic status or cultural background. |
Common Ethical Dilemmas
- Artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH): In advanced dementia, tube feeding does not improve survival, reduce aspiration or improve comfort. Hand-feeding is preferred. Artificial hydration via subcutaneous infusion may be considered in selected cases but is not routine.
- Antibiotics for recurrent infections in dementia: Treatment decisions should be guided by goals of care. In comfort-focused care, oral antibiotics for symptom relief may be appropriate; parenteral antibiotics and hospital transfer may not be.
- Double effect: Administering opioids or sedatives for symptom control that may, as a secondary effect, hasten death is ethically and legally permissible when the intention is to relieve suffering, the dose is proportionate to symptom severity and the decision is documented.
- Withholding vs withdrawing treatment: Ethically equivalent. There is no legal or ethical distinction between not starting a treatment and stopping a treatment that has become futile or non-beneficial.
- Clinician conscientious objection: Clinicians may hold personal views but must not impose them on patients. If unable to participate, they must facilitate timely transfer of care.
Substitute Decision-Making
When a person lacks capacity and has no valid ACD, decisions are made by a substitute decision-maker (SDM). The hierarchy of SDMs is defined by state and territory legislation and generally follows this order (varies by jurisdiction):
- Appointed guardian or medical treatment decision-maker (if formally appointed under state/territory legislation)
- Spouse or domestic partner
- Adult child (or eldest child, depending on jurisdiction)
- Parent
- Adult sibling
- Other relative or close friend
The SDM must act in accordance with the person's known wishes and values, not their own preferences. Where wishes are unknown, the SDM must act in the person's best interests, considering the person's values, cultural background and the medical evidence.
Elder Abuse and Safeguarding
Elder abuse includes physical, psychological, financial, sexual abuse and neglect. In Australia, the National Plan to Respond to the Abuse of Older Australians (Elder Abuse) 2019–2023 provides a framework. Key considerations for clinicians:
- Red flags include unexplained injuries, withdrawal, fear of a carer, sudden changes in financial arrangements, medication non-adherence due to carer withholding, and inadequate care in RACF settings
- Mandatory reporting applies to all forms of abuse in residential aged care under the Aged Care Act 1997
- State-based mandatory reporting provisions vary — in SA, NT and Queensland, there are specific elder abuse reporting frameworks
- Each state and territory has an Adult Safeguarding Unit or equivalent body for reporting and support
- The Older Persons Advocacy Network (OPAN) provides free, independent advocacy services nationally
Clinical Ethics Consultation
When ethical dilemmas cannot be resolved through standard clinical and family meetings, clinical ethics consultation should be sought. Most Australian tertiary hospitals have clinical ethics committees or access to ethics consultation services. The Australasian Association of Bioethics and Health Law (AABHL) and the Clinical Ethics Network and Research Australasia (CENTRA) provide directories of ethics resources.
Monitoring and Ongoing Assessment
Monitoring in palliative geriatric care shifts from disease-focused investigation to symptom-focused assessment. The frequency and intensity of monitoring should be aligned with goals of care and the patient's preferences.
Special Populations
Elderly / Frail
Renal Impairment
Hepatic Impairment
Dementia
Immunocompromised
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Considerations
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples experience significantly higher rates of chronic disease, earlier onset of multimorbidity and a median age of death approximately 8 years younger than non-Indigenous Australians. Palliative care access and utilisation remain markedly lower for Indigenous Australians, particularly those in remote communities.
📚 References
- 1. Palliative Care Australia. National Palliative Care Standards. 5th edn. Canberra: PCA; 2018.
- 2. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). National Consensus Statement: Essential Elements for Safe and High-Quality End-of-Life Care. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2015.
- 3. Advance Care Planning Australia. National Framework for Advance Care Planning. Melbourne: ACPA; 2021. Available at: advancecareplanning.org.au.
- 4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Palliative care services in Australia. AIHW; 2023. Cat. no. HWV 84.
- 5. Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC). National Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration Benchmarking Report. Wollongong: University of Wollongong; 2023.
- 6. Appelbaum PS. Assessment of patients' competence to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1834–1840.
- 7. Grisso T, Appelbaum PS. MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press; 1998.
- 8. Etchells E, Darzins P, Silberfeld M, et al. Assessment of patient capacity to consent to treatment. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(1):27–34.
- 9. Gallagher P, Ryan C, Byrne S, Kennedy J, O'Mahony D. STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment): consensus validation. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;46(2):72–83.
- 10. Lavan AH, Gallagher P, Parsons C, O'Mahony D. STOPPFrail: screening tool of older persons' prescriptions in frail adults with limited life expectancy — a consensus validation study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;77(7):1043–1051.
- 11. Mitchell SL, Teno JM, Kiely DK, et al. The clinical course of advanced dementia. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(16):1529–1538.
- 12. Abernethy AP, Currow DC, Frith P, Fazekas BS, McHugh A, Bui C. Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled crossover trial of sustained release morphine for the management of refractory dyspnoea. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):523–528.
- 13. Detering KM, Hancock AD, Reade MC, Silvester W. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010;340:c1345.
- 14. National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation (NACCHO). Providing palliative care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples: Practice Guide. Canberra: NACCHO; 2022.
- 15. Australian Government Department of Health. National Plan to Respond to the Abuse of Older Australians (Elder Abuse) 2019–2023. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2019.